Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026
Limb remote ischemic preconditioning attenuates biomarkers of acute lung injury and inflammation during thoracoscopic lobectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Wenfu, Zeng Mingwang, Yang Chao, Yang Lijun, Yang Juan, Wang Yi, Xie Haiyu, Wang Lifeng, Zhong Maolin, Hua Fuzhou, Liang Weidong
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: One-Lung Ventilation (OLV), though essential for thoracic surgery, triggers inflammation and oxidative stress that may lead to Acute Lung Injury (ALI). Remote Ischemic Preconditioning (RIPC) is a simple, non-invasive intervention that may activate protective pathways and reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury. This randomized controlled trial assessed whether limb RIPC attenuates OLV-induced lung injury during thoracoscopic lobectomy.
METHODS: Fifty-four patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy with OLV were randomized to the RIPC (n = 27) or Control (NC, n = 27) group. RIPC consisted of five cycles of 5-min ischemia and 5-min reperfusion using a lower limb tourniquet before OLV. Blood samples were collected at T0 (post-induction), T1 (30-min after OLV), T2 (90-min after OLV), and T3 (30-min after resumption two-lung ventilation). The primary endpoint was plasma CC16. Secondary endpoints included IL-6, MDA, arterial blood gases, Intraoperative Oxygenation Indices (OI, RI, A-aDO2, a/A), and hospital stay.
RESULTS: Plasma CC16, IL-6, and MDA levels were significantly lower in the RIPC group from T1 to T3 (all p < 0.001). In contrast, oxygenation indices, blood gas parameters, and hospital stay did not differ significantly between groups (all p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Limb RIPC effectively reduced systemic markers of lung injury (CC16), inflammation and oxidative stress during OLV but not in short-term improvements in oxygenation or clinical recovery. These findings suggest that RIPC confers molecular protection, with potential functional benefits requiring longer follow-up or evaluation in high-risk populations. Larger multicenter trials are warranted.
METHODS: Fifty-four patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy with OLV were randomized to the RIPC (n = 27) or Control (NC, n = 27) group. RIPC consisted of five cycles of 5-min ischemia and 5-min reperfusion using a lower limb tourniquet before OLV. Blood samples were collected at T0 (post-induction), T1 (30-min after OLV), T2 (90-min after OLV), and T3 (30-min after resumption two-lung ventilation). The primary endpoint was plasma CC16. Secondary endpoints included IL-6, MDA, arterial blood gases, Intraoperative Oxygenation Indices (OI, RI, A-aDO2, a/A), and hospital stay.
RESULTS: Plasma CC16, IL-6, and MDA levels were significantly lower in the RIPC group from T1 to T3 (all p < 0.001). In contrast, oxygenation indices, blood gas parameters, and hospital stay did not differ significantly between groups (all p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Limb RIPC effectively reduced systemic markers of lung injury (CC16), inflammation and oxidative stress during OLV but not in short-term improvements in oxygenation or clinical recovery. These findings suggest that RIPC confers molecular protection, with potential functional benefits requiring longer follow-up or evaluation in high-risk populations. Larger multicenter trials are warranted.