Clinical physiology and functional imaging · 2011
Axillary sentinel node identification in breast cancer patients: degree of radioactivity present at biopsy is critical.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nielsen Kristina R, Oturai Peter S, Friis Esbern, Hesse Ulrik, Callesen Torben, Nielsen Michael B, Chakera Annette H, Hesse Birger
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The radioactivity present in the patient (Act(rem) ) at sentinel node (SN) biopsy will depend on injected activity amount as well as on the time interval from tracer injection to biopsy, which both show great variations in the literature. The purpose of this study was to analyse the influence of varying Act(rem) levels on the outcome of axillary SN biopsy in patients with breast cancer (BC).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight hundred and fifty-eight patients with BC were consecutively referred to SN biopsy, 21% for a same-day and 79% of the patients for a 2-day procedure. Four hundred and nineteen patients underwent scintigraphy and 439 did not. For same-day procedures, 50 MBq (99m) Tc-nanocolloid (Nanocoll(®) ) was injected, and for 2-day procedures 110 MBq. For the analysis of SN biopsy outcome, the patients were divided into three Act(rem) groups: <10 (56% of the patients), 10-20 (23%), and >20 MBq (21%). During surgery, SNs were located using a hand-held gamma probe supported by image information when available and blue dye injection. Pathology included haematoxylin-eosin staining followed by immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS: The number of SNs removed (mean value 1·87 versus 2·14, P = 0·0003) and the probability of finding a malignant SN (P = 0·034) were lower in the <10 MBq group of patients compared with higher Act(rem) >20 MBq. Of the 25 patients with SN non-detection, 20 patients had an Act(rem) <10 MBq. Imaging had no significant influence on the number of patients with a malignant SN (P = 0·48).
CONCLUSION: Act(rem) above 10 MBq for nanocolloid tracer appears important for appropriate identification of SNs in patients with BC.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight hundred and fifty-eight patients with BC were consecutively referred to SN biopsy, 21% for a same-day and 79% of the patients for a 2-day procedure. Four hundred and nineteen patients underwent scintigraphy and 439 did not. For same-day procedures, 50 MBq (99m) Tc-nanocolloid (Nanocoll(®) ) was injected, and for 2-day procedures 110 MBq. For the analysis of SN biopsy outcome, the patients were divided into three Act(rem) groups: <10 (56% of the patients), 10-20 (23%), and >20 MBq (21%). During surgery, SNs were located using a hand-held gamma probe supported by image information when available and blue dye injection. Pathology included haematoxylin-eosin staining followed by immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS: The number of SNs removed (mean value 1·87 versus 2·14, P = 0·0003) and the probability of finding a malignant SN (P = 0·034) were lower in the <10 MBq group of patients compared with higher Act(rem) >20 MBq. Of the 25 patients with SN non-detection, 20 patients had an Act(rem) <10 MBq. Imaging had no significant influence on the number of patients with a malignant SN (P = 0·48).
CONCLUSION: Act(rem) above 10 MBq for nanocolloid tracer appears important for appropriate identification of SNs in patients with BC.