Acta neurologica Belgica · 2010
Carcinoembryonic antigen in the CSF of cancer patients--the value of intrathecal synthesis and correlation with IgA-diffusion dynamics.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Moldrich G, Lange P, Strik H
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The diagnostic impact of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was evaluated in serum and CSF of cancer and control patients.
METHODS: 97 analyses of CEA in CSF and serum from 83 cancer patients were compared with 41 cases without malignancy. CEA diffusion dynamics were evaluated with IgA CSF/serum quotients (Q IgA). Intrathecal synthesis of CEA was analysed both by calculating an index Q CEA/Q IgA and within the IgA-diagram.
RESULTS: In 73 samples without synthesis of IgA or CEA, both quotients correlated well with a mean Q CEA/Q IgA of 1.1 (95% CI 0.97-1.2). The Q CEA/Q IgA was significantly higher in metastasizing adenocarcinomas than in controls or other malignancies. In leptomeningeal disease from adenocarcinoma, Q CEA/Q IgA was significantly higher than in controls, while patients with CNS and/or bone metastases had intermediate values. The sensitivity to detect leptomeningeal disease was 91% and 69% for brain metastases. Q CEA/Q IgA and CEA synthesis assessed with the IgA diagram were equally sensitive.
CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of CEA in the IgA diagram is feasible and of clinical value. The consideration of intrathecal CEA synthesis correlates better with the clinical status than absolute CSF-CEA or the correlation with albumin.
METHODS: 97 analyses of CEA in CSF and serum from 83 cancer patients were compared with 41 cases without malignancy. CEA diffusion dynamics were evaluated with IgA CSF/serum quotients (Q IgA). Intrathecal synthesis of CEA was analysed both by calculating an index Q CEA/Q IgA and within the IgA-diagram.
RESULTS: In 73 samples without synthesis of IgA or CEA, both quotients correlated well with a mean Q CEA/Q IgA of 1.1 (95% CI 0.97-1.2). The Q CEA/Q IgA was significantly higher in metastasizing adenocarcinomas than in controls or other malignancies. In leptomeningeal disease from adenocarcinoma, Q CEA/Q IgA was significantly higher than in controls, while patients with CNS and/or bone metastases had intermediate values. The sensitivity to detect leptomeningeal disease was 91% and 69% for brain metastases. Q CEA/Q IgA and CEA synthesis assessed with the IgA diagram were equally sensitive.
CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of CEA in the IgA diagram is feasible and of clinical value. The consideration of intrathecal CEA synthesis correlates better with the clinical status than absolute CSF-CEA or the correlation with albumin.