Molecular imaging and biology · 2019
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Analysis for Assessing Tumor Staging and Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Correlation with p53 and Ki-67 Expression.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Feng, Wang Yuxiang, Zhou Yan, Liu Congrong, Liang Dong, Xie Lizhi, Yao Zhihang, Liu Jianyu
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate the potential of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram parameters in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) for distinguishing different tumor stages and determining lymph node status and correlations between ADC values and p53 and Ki-67 expression.
PROCEDURES: Forty-nine EOC patients underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Staging and lymph node status were determined postoperatively. ADC values were measured using histogram analysis and compared between groups. Relationships between ADCs and Ki-67 and p53 expression were explored.
RESULTS: DC parameters differed significantly between stage I vs II, I vs III, and I vs IV. The parameters were significantly lower in the lymph node-positive group than in the lymph node-negative group, were significantly negatively correlated with Ki-67 labeling index, and were all significantly lower in the mutation-type p53 group than in the wild-type p53 group.
CONCLUSIONS: ADC histogram analysis can help discriminate stage I from advanced-stage EOC and predict lymph node metastasis. ADC parameters were correlated with Ki-67 labeling index; the parameters may help indicate p53 expression.
PROCEDURES: Forty-nine EOC patients underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Staging and lymph node status were determined postoperatively. ADC values were measured using histogram analysis and compared between groups. Relationships between ADCs and Ki-67 and p53 expression were explored.
RESULTS: DC parameters differed significantly between stage I vs II, I vs III, and I vs IV. The parameters were significantly lower in the lymph node-positive group than in the lymph node-negative group, were significantly negatively correlated with Ki-67 labeling index, and were all significantly lower in the mutation-type p53 group than in the wild-type p53 group.
CONCLUSIONS: ADC histogram analysis can help discriminate stage I from advanced-stage EOC and predict lymph node metastasis. ADC parameters were correlated with Ki-67 labeling index; the parameters may help indicate p53 expression.