MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.10.002

Медицинская библиотека · Gastroenterologia y hepatologia · 2023

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma resection: Is it beneficial for survival in elderly patients?

Yu Min, Lu Lina, Wu Rongjin

СтатьяМетаанализПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

As the population ages, surgeons are growing frequently faced with hard choices among a vast array of treatment options for the elderly. This study was to investigate safety and efficacy of resection in elderly patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC).

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Literature reading and meta-analysis unveiled that elderly PHCC patients held a higher risk of death within 90 days after hepatectomy relative to younger patients, but their 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival were comparable. Among PHCC patients who underwent hepatectomy, the proportion of elderly patients with tumor classification Bismuth I-II and tumor stage pStage 1-3 was significantly higher than that of younger patients.

RESULTS

Curative resection R0 was more common in elderly patients than younger patients, but the difference was not statistically significant. Because of more comorbidities and less physiological reserve of elderly patients, they seemed to suffer more postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Considering improved life expectancy, it is crucial to treat elderly PHCC patients appropriately and attempts should be made to radical surgery based on comorbidities and functional status.

Для цитирования: Yu Min, Lu Lina, Wu Rongjin. Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma resection: Is it beneficial for survival in elderly patients?. Gastroenterologia y hepatologia. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.10.002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.