Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2008
Clinicopathological comparison of the World Health Organization/Wotherspoon score to the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adult grade for the post-treatment evaluation of gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shiozawa Eisuke, Norose Tomoko, Kaneko Kazuhiro, Yamochi-Onizuka Toshiko, Takimoto Masafumi, Imawari Michio, Ota Hidekazu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The World Health Organization (WHO) has adopted criteria for the histological differential diagnosis of gastric extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (GML) based on the criteria proposed by Wotherspoon in 1993 (WHO/Wotherspoon score). These histological criteria are commonly used by pathologists for initial diagnoses, but have not been adopted uniformly for the post-treatment evaluation of GML. In 2003, the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adult (GELA) proposed a new histological grading system (GELA grade) in preference to use of the WHO/Wotherspoon score for post-treatment evaluation. In the present study, we compared the WHO/Wotherspoon and GELA systems to examine which histological criterion is better for post-treatment evaluation.
METHODS: Fourteen cases of GML under long-term follow up were initially diagnosed according to the WHO criteria with detailed immunohistology, and were periodically evaluated with both histological criteria after anti-Helicobacter pylori treatment. They were also evaluated based on histological stromal changes accompanying the disappearance of lymphoma tissue.
RESULTS: The study showed strong similarities between the WHO/Wotherspoon and GELA systems and no clear advantage of either system for post-treatment evaluation. The GELA grade could not be used for the evaluation of changes in the degree of lymphoma infiltration from pre- to post-treatment because the four-item scale is not comparable with the formal six-point WHO/Wotherspoon scale. Stromal changes in the lamina propria, including an empty appearance and fibrosis, were correlated with lymphoma reduction after treatment and appear to be good indicators for post-treatment evaluation.
CONCLUSION: We propose the utilization of the WHO/Wotherspoon score accompanied by the assessment of stromal changes for the post-treatment evaluation of GML.
METHODS: Fourteen cases of GML under long-term follow up were initially diagnosed according to the WHO criteria with detailed immunohistology, and were periodically evaluated with both histological criteria after anti-Helicobacter pylori treatment. They were also evaluated based on histological stromal changes accompanying the disappearance of lymphoma tissue.
RESULTS: The study showed strong similarities between the WHO/Wotherspoon and GELA systems and no clear advantage of either system for post-treatment evaluation. The GELA grade could not be used for the evaluation of changes in the degree of lymphoma infiltration from pre- to post-treatment because the four-item scale is not comparable with the formal six-point WHO/Wotherspoon scale. Stromal changes in the lamina propria, including an empty appearance and fibrosis, were correlated with lymphoma reduction after treatment and appear to be good indicators for post-treatment evaluation.
CONCLUSION: We propose the utilization of the WHO/Wotherspoon score accompanied by the assessment of stromal changes for the post-treatment evaluation of GML.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsColoring AgentsEosine Yellowish-(YS)FemaleGastric MucosaHelicobacter pyloriHematoxylinHumansLymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal ZoneMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPredictive Value of TestsProton Pump InhibitorsRadiotherapy, AdjuvantStaining and LabelingStromal CellsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeWorld Health Organization