Annals of coloproctology · 2026
The Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary Committee Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0.
РекомендацииСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ryu Hyo Seon, Kim Hyun Jung, Kang Dong Hyun, Kwak Yoo-Kang, Kwak Han Deok, Kwon Yoon-Hye, Kim Dalyong, Kim Baek-Hui, Kim Jae Hyun, Kim Ji Hun, Kim Jin Won, Kim Tae Hyung, Kim Hae Young, Nam Soo Min, Noh Gyoung Tae, Bong Jun Woo, Sung Nak Song, Shin Seon Hui, Lee Kil-Yong, Lee Sung Chul, Lee Sea-Won, Lee Jung Won, Lee Jong Min, Ihn Myung Hoon, Lim Joo Han, Ji Woong Bae, Pyo Dae Hee, Hong Young Ki, Kwak Jung-Myun
Аннотация
Rectal cancer, which accounts for approximately 40% of colorectal cancers, remains a major clinical concern. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment have steadily improved rectal cancer outcomes. Considering this, the Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary (KRCM) Committee has aimed to provide clinicians and policymakers with up-to-date, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to support optimal decision-making, reflecting current evidence, the Korean healthcare context, and patient values and preferences. The Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0 were developed through multidisciplinary collaboration with related academic societies, building upon and updating the KRCM Clinical Practice Guidelines version 1.0 (titled "Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of rectal cancer"). These consensus guidelines of the KRCM were established based on a comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, with recommendation development guided by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and consideration of applicability in real-world clinical practice under the national health insurance system. Each recommendation has been presented with its strength and level of evidence.