Comparative study between amputation of the rectum in the classic Lloyd-Davies position and in ventral decubitus.

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate the benefits and disadvantages of the ventral decubitus position compared with that of Lloyd-Davies in patients submitted to abdominoperineal amputation of the rectum.

METHODS

we conducted a retrospective study of 56 patients submitted to abdominoperineal amputation of the rectum due to distal rectal and anal canal neoplasms, treated at the Central Hospital of the Santa Casa de Misericórdia in São Paulo between 2008 and 2017.

RESULTS

patients' mean age was 63.08 years, 48.2% of them women and 51.8%, men. Adenocarcinoma was the histological type, in 94.6% of cases, and squamous cell carcinoma, in 5.4%. The position of Lloyd-Davies was adopted in 66.1% of the procedures, and the ventral position, in 33.9%. At the time of surgery, four patients had synchronous metastases: hepatic (one case), pulmonary (one case) and simultaneous liver and lung (two cases). Neoadjuvant treatment was performed in 85.7% of the patients. Late postoperative complications occurred in 13 patients operated in the classic position and in one patient operated on in the ventral decubitus position. The overall survival time for the group operated in the classic position was on average 45.7 months, while in the group operated on in the ventral decubitus position it was 15.5 months.

CONCLUSION

the ventral position group presented less need for intraoperative intravenous volume infusion and fewer postoperative complications, whereas the Lloyd-Davies group had better surgical and anesthetic times. Relapse, disease-free time, and overall survival should be evaluated at a longer follow-up time.