Digestive surgery · 2024
Impact of Early Oral Feeding on Postoperative Outcomes after Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Soo Young, Han Eon Chul
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of early oral feeding (EOF), a key component of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.
METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed databases to include randomized clinical trials comparing EOF that started on postoperative day 1 and conventional oral feeding that commenced after first flatus. Two authors independently screened the retrieved records and extracted data. The primary outcome was total complications. Data were pooled, and the overall effect size was calculated using a fixed-effect model.
RESULTS: We screened 13 studies, and 1,556 patients were included in the analysis. The EOF group exhibited fewer total complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-0.65). Anastomotic leakage was also reduced in the EOF group (OR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.19-0.83); however, an increased incidence of vomiting (OR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.11-2.26) as well as a tendency of higher rate of nasogastric tube reinsertion (OR: 1.49; 95% CI: 0.96-2.31) were observed. The EOF group demonstrated a decreased time to flatus (mean difference [MD] -0.87; 95% CI: -1.00 to -0.74) and shortened hospital stay (MD: -0.76; 95% CI: -0.89 to -0.6). No significant difference in mortality was observed between the two groups (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.15-2.01).
CONCLUSION: EOF proved to be a safe and effective practice for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. However, the increased incidence of vomiting necessitates careful consideration.
METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed databases to include randomized clinical trials comparing EOF that started on postoperative day 1 and conventional oral feeding that commenced after first flatus. Two authors independently screened the retrieved records and extracted data. The primary outcome was total complications. Data were pooled, and the overall effect size was calculated using a fixed-effect model.
RESULTS: We screened 13 studies, and 1,556 patients were included in the analysis. The EOF group exhibited fewer total complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-0.65). Anastomotic leakage was also reduced in the EOF group (OR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.19-0.83); however, an increased incidence of vomiting (OR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.11-2.26) as well as a tendency of higher rate of nasogastric tube reinsertion (OR: 1.49; 95% CI: 0.96-2.31) were observed. The EOF group demonstrated a decreased time to flatus (mean difference [MD] -0.87; 95% CI: -1.00 to -0.74) and shortened hospital stay (MD: -0.76; 95% CI: -0.89 to -0.6). No significant difference in mortality was observed between the two groups (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.15-2.01).
CONCLUSION: EOF proved to be a safe and effective practice for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. However, the increased incidence of vomiting necessitates careful consideration.