Surgical technology international · 2018
Favorable Management of Low Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage with Transanal Conventional and Endoscopic Drainage (GelPOINT® Path Transanal Access Platform).
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lazzar Claudio, Currò Giuseppe, Komaei Iman, Barbera Adalberto, Navarra Giuseppe
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We describe our experience with transanal-laparoscopic treatment of anastomotic leakage.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Anastomotic leakage leads to high mortality rates, morbidity, a complicated post-operative course and increased cost. The management of low anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal cancer is not standardized.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study based on prospectively collected data. Among patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer in our division between January 2014 and October 2017, 14 developed colorectal or colo-anal anastomotic leakage and underwent reoperation with a transanal approach. Data regarding patient demographics, reoperative outcomes, morbidity, length of hospital stay, mortality, leak closure and long-term outcomes are presented.
RESULTS: In all patients, anastomotic healing was confirmed by radiology. No perioperative complications were detected. One patient presented anastomotic stricture after 20 months, which was successfully treated with dilatation.
CONCLUSIONS: There is little information available on the management of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Although more studies are needed to standardize patient selection criteria and evaluate the long-term outcome of these procedures, minimally invasive transanal conventional and laparoscopic anastomotic leak repair is a feasible and safe surgical option that can often avoid the need for anastomotic takedown and stoma formation.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Anastomotic leakage leads to high mortality rates, morbidity, a complicated post-operative course and increased cost. The management of low anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal cancer is not standardized.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study based on prospectively collected data. Among patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer in our division between January 2014 and October 2017, 14 developed colorectal or colo-anal anastomotic leakage and underwent reoperation with a transanal approach. Data regarding patient demographics, reoperative outcomes, morbidity, length of hospital stay, mortality, leak closure and long-term outcomes are presented.
RESULTS: In all patients, anastomotic healing was confirmed by radiology. No perioperative complications were detected. One patient presented anastomotic stricture after 20 months, which was successfully treated with dilatation.
CONCLUSIONS: There is little information available on the management of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Although more studies are needed to standardize patient selection criteria and evaluate the long-term outcome of these procedures, minimally invasive transanal conventional and laparoscopic anastomotic leak repair is a feasible and safe surgical option that can often avoid the need for anastomotic takedown and stoma formation.