The Journal of infectious diseases · 2018
Presence of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Apolipoprotein B Messenger RNA Editing, Catalytic Polypeptide-Like 3 (APOBEC)-Related Minority Variants in HPV-16 Genomes From Anal and Cervical Samples but Not in HPV-52 and HPV-58.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mariaggi Alice-Andrée, Péré Hélène, Perrier Marine, Visseaux Benoit, Collin Gilles, Veyer David, Le Hingrat Quentin, Ferré Valentine Marie, Joly Véronique, Couvelard Anne, Bucau Margot, Davitian Carine, Descamps Diane, Abramowitz Laurent, Charpentier Charlotte
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of minority variants (MVs) in high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types (HPV-16, -52, and -58) from cervical and anal smears.
METHODS: Whole HPV genome ultra-deep sequencing (UDS) was performed on cervical and anal smears collected during patient follow-up. Bioinformatics analyses were performed using Bowtie2 (Geneious).
RESULTS: We assessed 55 HPV-16-positive, 20 HPV-52-positive, and 17 HPV-58-positive samples, with significant differences in patient characteristics for the 2 anatomic sites. HPV-16 MVs were detected in 20 samples (36%), with no difference between cervical and anal samples. We did not find an association between the presence of MVs and cytovirological parameters. Seven HPV-16 genomes (13%) were apolipoprotein B messenger RNA editing, catalytic polypeptide-like 3 (APOBEC) edited. Among the cervical HPV-16-positive samples, most MVs (55%) resulted from APOBEC-related mutations. MVs were detected in 10 HPV-52-positive (50%) and 12 HPV-58-positive (71%) samples, with no difference between cervical and anal samples. No APOBEC-related mutations were found on HPV-58 or HPV-52 genomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, high-risk HPV MVs were found in about half of all cases in both anal and cervical samples. Interestingly, we reported for the first time a differential impact of APOBEC3 mutagenic activity depending on high-risk HPV type.
METHODS: Whole HPV genome ultra-deep sequencing (UDS) was performed on cervical and anal smears collected during patient follow-up. Bioinformatics analyses were performed using Bowtie2 (Geneious).
RESULTS: We assessed 55 HPV-16-positive, 20 HPV-52-positive, and 17 HPV-58-positive samples, with significant differences in patient characteristics for the 2 anatomic sites. HPV-16 MVs were detected in 20 samples (36%), with no difference between cervical and anal samples. We did not find an association between the presence of MVs and cytovirological parameters. Seven HPV-16 genomes (13%) were apolipoprotein B messenger RNA editing, catalytic polypeptide-like 3 (APOBEC) edited. Among the cervical HPV-16-positive samples, most MVs (55%) resulted from APOBEC-related mutations. MVs were detected in 10 HPV-52-positive (50%) and 12 HPV-58-positive (71%) samples, with no difference between cervical and anal samples. No APOBEC-related mutations were found on HPV-58 or HPV-52 genomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, high-risk HPV MVs were found in about half of all cases in both anal and cervical samples. Interestingly, we reported for the first time a differential impact of APOBEC3 mutagenic activity depending on high-risk HPV type.