[Modern view on the problem of diagnostics of renal angiomioadenomatous tumor].

INTRODUCTION

Angiomyoadenomatous tumor as a nosological entity is not included in the latest version of the International Histological Classification of Kidney Tumors (WHO, 2022) and is related to provisional entity. Currently, there is no consensus among researchers about the nosological affiliation of an angiomyoadenomatous tumor.

AIM: To comparatively analyze the histological, immunophenotypic, ultrastructural and molecular parameters of renal angiomyoadenomatous tumor and clear cell papillary renal cell tumor.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The study was performed on surgical specimen from 5 and 10 patients with renal angiomyoadenomatous tumor and with clear cell papillary renal cell tumor, respectively. Immunohistochemical study was carried out on paraffin sections according to the standard protocol. Antibodies HMWCK, AE1/AE3, 7, E-Cadherin, EMA, PAX8 and 9 were chosen. To study tumor tissues on semi-thin and ultra-thin sections, an electron microscope Philips TECNAI 12 BioTwinD-265 was used. For in situ fluorescent diagnostic detection, defined centromere probes, LSI 13/21, LSI N25 /LSI ARSA, TelVysion telomeric probe and a two-color VHL/CEP3 probe were used.

RESULTS

Angiomyoadenomatous tumor is characterized by a three-phase structure. In contrast to clear cell papillary renal cell tumor, angiomyoadenomatous tumors show complete membranous expression of CA9.

CONCLUSION

Our results allow to state that angiomyoadenomatous tumor and clear cell papillary renal cell tumor are different neoplasms.