Indian journal of pathology & microbiology · 2024
Hepatic and perihepatic PEComas: A study describing a series of five rare cases.
СтатьяКлинический случайНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vijayanirmala P, Yadav Rajni, Goyal Surbhi, Barwad Adarsh, Bhowmik Subham, Malik Rohan, Pal Sujoy, Sharma Raju, Sakhuja Puja, Das Prasenjit
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) encompass a group of rare mesenchymal neoplasms, with dual melanocytic and muscular differentiation. Hepatic PEComas are rare and difficult to diagnose, and their behavior is still unclear.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Herein, we report a total of five cases of hepatic and perihepatic PEComas over a period of the last 5 years from our and collaborating center's archive. A detailed histological evaluation was done. A comprehensive panel of immunohistochemical stains was used and fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis was performed for the TFE3 gene using break-apart probes.
RESULT: All these patients were women, with an average age of presentation of 44 years. The lesions were in the right hepatic lobe: three cases, the left hepatic lobe: one case, and gastrohepatic ligament: one case. The preoperative clinicoradiological diagnoses were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), focal nodular hyperplasia, hemangioma, metastasis, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor, respectively. Surgical excision was performed in four cases with no further adjuvant therapy. Histopathological examination and subsequent immunophenotyping revealed a diagnosis of PEComa. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis was performed for TFE3 gene rearrangement in four cases.
CONCLUSIONS: This series highlights the fact that accurate histological diagnosis of hepatic or perihepatic PEComas is important to prevent unnecessary aggressive treatment, unlike primary hepatocellular carcinomas or hepatoid/epithelioid metastatic tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Herein, we report a total of five cases of hepatic and perihepatic PEComas over a period of the last 5 years from our and collaborating center's archive. A detailed histological evaluation was done. A comprehensive panel of immunohistochemical stains was used and fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis was performed for the TFE3 gene using break-apart probes.
RESULT: All these patients were women, with an average age of presentation of 44 years. The lesions were in the right hepatic lobe: three cases, the left hepatic lobe: one case, and gastrohepatic ligament: one case. The preoperative clinicoradiological diagnoses were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), focal nodular hyperplasia, hemangioma, metastasis, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor, respectively. Surgical excision was performed in four cases with no further adjuvant therapy. Histopathological examination and subsequent immunophenotyping revealed a diagnosis of PEComa. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis was performed for TFE3 gene rearrangement in four cases.
CONCLUSIONS: This series highlights the fact that accurate histological diagnosis of hepatic or perihepatic PEComas is important to prevent unnecessary aggressive treatment, unlike primary hepatocellular carcinomas or hepatoid/epithelioid metastatic tumors.