Post cricoid tumours; a limiting factor for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion in cancer patients: Results from a tertiary care hospital.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The aim of this study was to review all episodes of PEG insertion in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) at a cancer specialist centre.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Using a structured data extraction form, we abstracted patients' demographic data and clinical information including the primary site of tumour, TNM staging, whether PEG tube was inserted successfully, any complications resulting from PEG tube insertion and duration the tube was in place.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 339 HNC patients who had received at least one attempted PEG tube insertion. The mean age of patients was 49.5 ± 14.5 years and 66% (n: 233/339) were males. 151/ 339 (44.5%) patients had a tumour in the pharynx and nasopharynx, 103/ 339 (30.4%) in oral cavity, 81/ 339 (23.9%) in post-cricoid region and 4 (1.1%) of the patients had a laryngeal carcinoma. Histopathologically, most tumours (75.8%) were squamous cell carcinoma presenting at a T4 (52.6%), N0 (38.3%) and M0 (91.7%) stage. PEG tube was successfully inserted in 303/339 (89.4%) patients. There were 36 PEG failures; 24 (66.6%) in postcricoid and laryngeal tumours, 8 (22.3%) in pharynx/nasopharynx and 4 (11.1%) in oral cavity tumours. Of the 81 patients with post-cricoid tumour, PEG tube was successfully inserted in 57/ 81 (70.3%) of the patients. Age, gender or T stage of the tumour was not found to be statistically significant predictors of PEG failure. The only significant factor was presence of post-cricoid or laryngeal tumours that increased the risk of PEG failure 12 times (95% confidence interval: 3.4 to 42.3).

CONCLUSION

PEG tube should be used as a first line feeding option in patients with all type of head and neck cancers, however, the attending clinicians should have this foresight of higher failure rates in patients with post-cricoid tumour.