[Extracapsular dissection versus superficial parotidectomy for treatment of parotid benign tumors: evidence based medicine analysis].

Objective:The aim of this study is to systematically assess the clinical outcomes of extracapsular dissection (ECD) and superficial parotidectomy (SP), and to provide evidences for the clinical decision for treatment of parotid gland benign tumors. Method:Relevant studies that compared the outcomes of extracapsular dissection and superficial parotidectomy for the parotid benign tumors were searched in Pubmed, CNKI and Wangfang data databases, and Meta-analysis was performed using software RevMan 5.0. Result:Fifteen studies were selected for the Meta-analysis. A total of 2 929 participants were included in those studies, of which 1 796 underwent ECD and 1 133 underwent SP. The recurrence rates for ECD and SP were 1.29% (23 of 1 776 cases) and 1.48% (16 of 1 081 cases), respectively. There were no statistically significant in recurrence rate between ECD and SP. The rates of transient facial nerve paresis for ECD and SP were 5.48% (74 of 1 350) and 22.94% (139 of 606), that of permanent facial nerve paralysis were 0.66% (8 of 1 221) and 2.71% (15 of 554). The incidences of Frey's syndrome in ECD group and SP group were 1.91% (26 of 1 360) and 16.71% (111 of 664), that of fistula in were 0.53% (5 of 946) and 2.96% (10 of 338). ECD could reduce the risk for complications compared with SP. Conclusion:This systematic review with Meta-analysis suggests that ECD has a similar recurrence rate as SP with fewer postoperative complications. ECD may be considered as an alternative surgical modality for select benign parotid tumor.