Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2018
Preservation of Salivary Function Following Extracapsular Dissection for Tumors of the Parotid Gland.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Park Sung Joon, Han Sungjun, Lee Hyo-Jung, Ahn Soon-Hyun, Jeong Woo-Jin
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study evaluated salivary function after extracapsular dissection (ECD) compared with partial superficial parotidectomy (PSP) and classic superficial parotidectomy (CSP) of benign parotid gland tumors. The authors hypothesized that ECD would be superior to PSP and CSP in preserving postoperative salivary function.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analyses were performed for 43 consecutive patients who underwent parotidectomies of benign parotid tumors performed by a single experienced surgeon. Clinical data and pre- and postoperative whole salivary flow rates were compared among the operative procedures. Pearson χ2 and Fisher exact tests were used to compare categorical variables. Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare means. A P value less than .05 was considered significant throughout the study.
RESULTS: Tumor sizes did not differ among groups. Operative times, amounts of drainage, and hospital days for ECD were markedly decreased compared with CSP and tended to be decreased compared with PSP. Resection margins were exposed in 0, 12.5, and 6.7% of patients who underwent ECD, PSP, and CSP, respectively. Postoperative complications occurred less often (but not meaningfully) after ECD. Postoperative basal salivary flow rates in the ECD, PSP, and CSP groups were 0.39, 0.32, and 0.14 mL/minute, respectively (P = .05). Stimulated salivary flow rates remained stable for the ECD and PSP groups but decreased in the CSP group.
CONCLUSION: ECD is a safe and time-efficient surgical approach, offering early recovery from parotid tumors and better preservation of salivary function. ECD should be considered a surgical approach for parotid tumors, especially those in the parotid tail region, such as Warthin tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analyses were performed for 43 consecutive patients who underwent parotidectomies of benign parotid tumors performed by a single experienced surgeon. Clinical data and pre- and postoperative whole salivary flow rates were compared among the operative procedures. Pearson χ2 and Fisher exact tests were used to compare categorical variables. Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare means. A P value less than .05 was considered significant throughout the study.
RESULTS: Tumor sizes did not differ among groups. Operative times, amounts of drainage, and hospital days for ECD were markedly decreased compared with CSP and tended to be decreased compared with PSP. Resection margins were exposed in 0, 12.5, and 6.7% of patients who underwent ECD, PSP, and CSP, respectively. Postoperative complications occurred less often (but not meaningfully) after ECD. Postoperative basal salivary flow rates in the ECD, PSP, and CSP groups were 0.39, 0.32, and 0.14 mL/minute, respectively (P = .05). Stimulated salivary flow rates remained stable for the ECD and PSP groups but decreased in the CSP group.
CONCLUSION: ECD is a safe and time-efficient surgical approach, offering early recovery from parotid tumors and better preservation of salivary function. ECD should be considered a surgical approach for parotid tumors, especially those in the parotid tail region, such as Warthin tumors.