International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 1998
Continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy with/without mitomycin C in head and neck cancer.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dobrowsky W, Naudé J, Widder J, Dobrowsky E, Millesi W, Pavelka R, Grasl C, Reichel M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of mitomycin C to an accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy. The aim was to test a very short schedule with/without mitomycin C (MMC) with conventional fractionation in histologically verified squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: From October 1990 to December 1996, 188 patients entered the trial. Tumors originated in the oral cavity in 54, oropharynx in 82, larynx in 20, and hypopharynx in 32 cases, respectively. Patients' stages were predominantly T3 and T4 (158/188, 84%) and most patients had lymph node metastases (144/188, 77%) at diagnosis. Only 22 patients were female, 166 were male, the median age of patients was 57 years (range 34 to 76 years). Patients were randomized to one of the following three treatment options: conventional fractionation (CF) consisting of 70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks (65 patients) or continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy (V-CHART; 62 patients) or continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy with 20 mg/sqm MMC on day 5 (V-CHART + MMC; 61 patients). By the accelerated regimens, the total dose of 55.3 Gy was delivered within 17 consecutive days, by 33 fractions. On day 1, a single dose of 2.5 Gy was given, from day 2 to 17 a dose of 1.65 Gy was delivered twice: the interfraction interval was 6 hours or more.
RESULTS: Mucositis was very intense after accelerated therapy, most patients experiencing a grade III/IV reaction. The mucosal reaction did not differ whether MMC was administered or not. Patients treated by accelerated fractionation experienced a confluent mucosal reaction 12-14 days following start of therapy and recovered (no reaction) within 6 weeks. The skin reaction was not considered different in the three treatment groups. Those patients treated with additional chemotherapy experienced a grade III/IV hematologic toxicity in 12/61 patients. Initial complete response (CR) was recorded in 43% following CF, 58% after V-CHART, and 67% after V-CHART + MMC, respectively (p < 0.05). Actuarial survival (Kaplan-Meier) was significantly improved in the combined treated patients. Local tumor control was 28%, 32%, and 56% following CF, V-CHART, and V-CHART + MMC, respectively (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: We conclude that our continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy regimen is equal to conventional fractionation, suggesting that by shortening the overall treatment time from 7 weeks to 17 days a reduction in dose from 70 Gy to 55.3 Gy is possible, with maintenance of local tumor control rates. The administration of MMC to the accelerated regimen is tolerable and improves the outcome for patients significantly.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: From October 1990 to December 1996, 188 patients entered the trial. Tumors originated in the oral cavity in 54, oropharynx in 82, larynx in 20, and hypopharynx in 32 cases, respectively. Patients' stages were predominantly T3 and T4 (158/188, 84%) and most patients had lymph node metastases (144/188, 77%) at diagnosis. Only 22 patients were female, 166 were male, the median age of patients was 57 years (range 34 to 76 years). Patients were randomized to one of the following three treatment options: conventional fractionation (CF) consisting of 70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks (65 patients) or continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy (V-CHART; 62 patients) or continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy with 20 mg/sqm MMC on day 5 (V-CHART + MMC; 61 patients). By the accelerated regimens, the total dose of 55.3 Gy was delivered within 17 consecutive days, by 33 fractions. On day 1, a single dose of 2.5 Gy was given, from day 2 to 17 a dose of 1.65 Gy was delivered twice: the interfraction interval was 6 hours or more.
RESULTS: Mucositis was very intense after accelerated therapy, most patients experiencing a grade III/IV reaction. The mucosal reaction did not differ whether MMC was administered or not. Patients treated by accelerated fractionation experienced a confluent mucosal reaction 12-14 days following start of therapy and recovered (no reaction) within 6 weeks. The skin reaction was not considered different in the three treatment groups. Those patients treated with additional chemotherapy experienced a grade III/IV hematologic toxicity in 12/61 patients. Initial complete response (CR) was recorded in 43% following CF, 58% after V-CHART, and 67% after V-CHART + MMC, respectively (p < 0.05). Actuarial survival (Kaplan-Meier) was significantly improved in the combined treated patients. Local tumor control was 28%, 32%, and 56% following CF, V-CHART, and V-CHART + MMC, respectively (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: We conclude that our continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy regimen is equal to conventional fractionation, suggesting that by shortening the overall treatment time from 7 weeks to 17 days a reduction in dose from 70 Gy to 55.3 Gy is possible, with maintenance of local tumor control rates. The administration of MMC to the accelerated regimen is tolerable and improves the outcome for patients significantly.