Surgery in practice and science · 2026
Late reoperative surgery after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: A novel pancreaticogastrostomy Based on the "Modified Blumgart" Philosophy (with video).
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cai Yu, Su Xiangjie, Liu Xiaohong, Peng Yong, Li Xingzhi, Wang Ankang, Feng Yuan
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Minimal-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy has become an established procedure for pancreatic head tumors. Local recurrence or anastomotic stricture requiring reoperation is uncommon, and no standardized approach exists for re-anastomosis of the pancreatic remnant. This article demonstrates a novel modified locking technique of Blumgart pancreaticogastrostomy applied during re-laparoscopy.
METHODS: The locking Blumgart pancreaticogastrostomy was performed in four layers: the posterior pancreatic stump-to-stomach layer, the posterior and lateral pancreatic duct-to-gastric mucosa layer, the anterior pancreatic duct-to-gastric mucosa layer, and the anterior pancreatic stump-to-stomach layer.
RESULTS: Three cases of the pancreatogastric anastomosis procedure were carried out. No postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred, with no incidence of pancreatogastric anastomotic stricture observed during follow-up. The technical rationale of this anastomotic approach include: 1) avoidance of resection of the original afferent jejunal limb, 2) a more physiological mucosa-to-mucosa adaptation between the pancreatic duct and gastric wall, and 3) use of a locking mattress suture to achieve more complete hemostasis, and 4) separate suturing of the anterior/posterior and lateral walls of both the pancreatic duct and gastric mucosa.
CONCLUSIONS: The modified locking Blumgart pancreaticogastrostomy is technically feasible and demonstrates preliminary safety in reoperative surgery for late local tumor recurrence or anastomotic stricture at the pancreaticojejunal site following minimal-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy.
METHODS: The locking Blumgart pancreaticogastrostomy was performed in four layers: the posterior pancreatic stump-to-stomach layer, the posterior and lateral pancreatic duct-to-gastric mucosa layer, the anterior pancreatic duct-to-gastric mucosa layer, and the anterior pancreatic stump-to-stomach layer.
RESULTS: Three cases of the pancreatogastric anastomosis procedure were carried out. No postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred, with no incidence of pancreatogastric anastomotic stricture observed during follow-up. The technical rationale of this anastomotic approach include: 1) avoidance of resection of the original afferent jejunal limb, 2) a more physiological mucosa-to-mucosa adaptation between the pancreatic duct and gastric wall, and 3) use of a locking mattress suture to achieve more complete hemostasis, and 4) separate suturing of the anterior/posterior and lateral walls of both the pancreatic duct and gastric mucosa.
CONCLUSIONS: The modified locking Blumgart pancreaticogastrostomy is technically feasible and demonstrates preliminary safety in reoperative surgery for late local tumor recurrence or anastomotic stricture at the pancreaticojejunal site following minimal-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy.