Journal of bronchology & interventional pulmonology · 2025
Utility of EBUS-TBNA in Evaluating Mediastinal and Hilar Lymphadenopathy in Patients With Silica Exposure: A Retrospective Single-center Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aljarod Tarake M, Mehta Atul C, Sigdel Saroj K, Akers Mark Jason, Saylor John L, Clark Caleb S, Shweihat Yousef R
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is used effectively in staging lung cancer and in the evaluation of benign causes of mediastinal and/or hilar lymphadenopathy (MHL), such as sarcoidosis. However, evidence for its utility in the diagnostic workup of silicosis is limited.
METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included patients with occupational silica exposure who underwent EBUS-TBNA to evaluate MHL on computed tomography (CT). Cytology specimens were re-examined by an independent pathologist under polarized microscopy, and cytologic criteria for the diagnosis of LN silicosis were formulated from the findings. Primary outcomes were the determination of the diagnostic yield (DY) of EBUS-TBNA for LN silicosis and the assessment of its sensitivity for the diagnosis of parenchymal silicosis in patients with known chronic silicosis.
RESULTS: Eighty-four patients with silica exposure underwent EBUS-TBNA to evaluate MHL. This population is predominantly coal miners, 77 (91%). Birefringent silica particles (BSP) were identified in 82 (97.62%), silicotic nodules (SN) in 26 (30.95%), and granulomas in 21 (25%). EBUS-TBNA demonstrated a DY of 95.2% for LN silicosis, and supported the diagnosis of parenchymal silicosis with a sensitivity of 97.6%.
CONCLUSION: EBUS-TBNA effectively identifies LN silicosis and confirms the diagnosis of parenchymal silicosis in the appropriate clinical-radiologic context. Granulomas can be seen in cytologic specimens of patients with silicosis. In patients with well-defined silica exposure and suspected silicosis, EBUS-TBNA does not impact the preprocedural presumed diagnosis of silicosis. Therefore, EBUS-TBNA should be reserved for cases in which alternative diagnoses are more likely.
METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included patients with occupational silica exposure who underwent EBUS-TBNA to evaluate MHL on computed tomography (CT). Cytology specimens were re-examined by an independent pathologist under polarized microscopy, and cytologic criteria for the diagnosis of LN silicosis were formulated from the findings. Primary outcomes were the determination of the diagnostic yield (DY) of EBUS-TBNA for LN silicosis and the assessment of its sensitivity for the diagnosis of parenchymal silicosis in patients with known chronic silicosis.
RESULTS: Eighty-four patients with silica exposure underwent EBUS-TBNA to evaluate MHL. This population is predominantly coal miners, 77 (91%). Birefringent silica particles (BSP) were identified in 82 (97.62%), silicotic nodules (SN) in 26 (30.95%), and granulomas in 21 (25%). EBUS-TBNA demonstrated a DY of 95.2% for LN silicosis, and supported the diagnosis of parenchymal silicosis with a sensitivity of 97.6%.
CONCLUSION: EBUS-TBNA effectively identifies LN silicosis and confirms the diagnosis of parenchymal silicosis in the appropriate clinical-radiologic context. Granulomas can be seen in cytologic specimens of patients with silicosis. In patients with well-defined silica exposure and suspected silicosis, EBUS-TBNA does not impact the preprocedural presumed diagnosis of silicosis. Therefore, EBUS-TBNA should be reserved for cases in which alternative diagnoses are more likely.