DOI 10.1007/s00464-025-12410-z
Artificial intelligence assistance narrows the experience gap in endoscopic reporting of gastric lesions: a prospective clinical trial.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
High-quality endoscopic reports are crucial for clinical decision-making in gastric lesions. However, manually generated reports often suffer from inconsistencies, resulting in incomplete lesion documentation and insufficient descriptions. The objective is to validate an artificial intelligence (AI) reporting system for improving the quality of gastric lesion documentation with a particular focus on narrowing the experience gap among endoscopists.
METHODS
We retrospectively collected gastric images to develop a reporting system for gastric lesions. The system comprises several deep learning models for lesion detection, classification, and feature recognition, and was validated using 276 video clips. Both retrospective and prospective case validations were conducted to evaluate the system's clinical effectiveness, comparing the completeness of reports with and without AI assistance, particularly in describing features of suspicious lesions.
RESULTS
In video validation, the system identified 99.27% (274/276) of lesions, with 88.97% accuracy in neoplasm detection, achieving 93.75% sensitivity and 86.98% specificity. Retrospective analyses showed that junior endoscopists using AI reported significantly more complete lesion documentation than original reports (74.75% vs 58.08%, P < 0.001). In the prospective trial, the AI-assisted group demonstrated superior lesion reporting completeness (86.50% vs 75.11%, P = 0.001). Notably, the AI group reported all 18 identified suspicious neoplasms, while the routine group reported only 16.
CONCLUSIONS
This study confirms the efficacy of an AI reporting system in documenting gastric focal lesions, highlighting significant improvements in the completeness and accuracy of reports generated by endoscopists.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.