MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5173/ceju.2013.02.art6

Медицинская библиотека · Central European journal of urology · 2013

Optical coherence tomography diagnostics for onco-urology. Review of clinical perspectives.

Kharchenko Sergiy, Adamowicz Jan, Wojtkowski Maciej, Drewa Tomasz

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is being investigated widely for use in urologic pathology. The current imaging of urogenital cancers cannot be perfect, thus, routine methods demands new updates or inventions of alternative radiological scope. OCT presents so-called "live" optical biopsy. The authors aim to review this modality for uro-oncological purposes.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

[corrected] A series of 37 publications between 1989 and 2012 was selected and cited from GoogleScholar and PubMED/MEDLINE. The urogenital tract (bladder, ureter, scrotum organs and prostate) was imaged by OCT.

RESULTS

The overall OCT sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, negative and positive predictive values ranged a lot on example of the urinary bladder's tumors screening. The data were 75-100%, 65-97.9%, 92%, 75%, 100%, respectively. Notwithstanding, a diagnostic importance of OCT may be comparable with urine cytology, cystoscopy, computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

OCT demonstrated its imaging potential, while till the present OCT plays role of an additional imaging. Future progress of OCT involvement in experimental and clinical once-urological diagnostics is needed under high evidence control.

Для цитирования: Kharchenko Sergiy, Adamowicz Jan, Wojtkowski Maciej, Drewa Tomasz. Optical coherence tomography diagnostics for onco-urology. Review of clinical perspectives.. Central European journal of urology. 2013. DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2013.02.art6.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.