Endopyelotomy outcome as a function of high versus dependent ureteral insertion.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether a high versus a dependent ureteral insertion significantly affects the outcome of endopyelotomy for management of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction.

METHODS

Sixty patients with UPJ obstruction were treated with an endopyelotomy by way of either an antegrade percutaneous approach (n = 36) or a retrograde hot-wire balloon incision (n = 24). In these 60 patients, the ureteral insertion was high on the renal pelvis in 19 (32%), dependent in 25 (42%), and indeterminate in 16 (26%). Intravenous urography was performed 4 to 6 weeks after stent removal (8 to 12 weeks after endopyelotomy) and then at 6 to 12-month intervals. Success of the procedure was defined as resolution of symptoms and decrease in hydronephrosis compared with pre-endopyelotomy studies.

RESULTS

With a follow-up range of 2 to 41 months (mean 10.3), the overall success rate was 80%. This rate was independent of whether the procedure was performed in an antegrade or retrograde fashion. A successful result was achieved in 15 (78.9%) of those with a high insertion, 19 (76%) of those with a dependent insertion, and 14 (87.5%) of those with an equivocal insertion; these differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

The type of ureteral insertion (ie, high versus dependent) had no significant impact on the outcome of endopyelotomy by way of either a percutaneous or retrograde approach. As such, these anatomic variations need not play a role in a decision-making algorithm for contemporary management of UPJ obstruction.