Brachytherapy · 2020
A comparison of treatment planning techniques for low-dose-rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Connolly David, Sands Gordon, Winter Helen, Foley Mark J, Kleefeld Christoph
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plans created using three retrospectively applied planning techniques with plans delivered to patients.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment plans were created retrospectively on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) scans for 26 patients. The technique dubbed 4D Brachytherapy was applied, using TRUS and MRI to obtain prostatic measurements required for the associated webBXT online nomogram. Using a patient's MRI scan to create a treatment plan involving loose seeds was also explored. Plans delivered to patients were made using an intraoperative loose seed TRUS-based planning technique. Prostate V100 (%), prostate V150 (%), prostate D90 (Gy), rectum D0.1cc (Gy), rectum D2cc (Gy), urethra D10 (%), urethra D30 (%), and prostate volumes were measured for each patient. Statistical analysis was used to assess and compare plans.
RESULTS: Prostate volumes measured by TRUS and MRI were significantly different. Prostate volumes calculated by the webBXT online nomogram using TRUS- and MRI-based measurements were not significantly different. Compared with delivered plans, TRUS-based 4D Brachytherapy plans showed significantly lower rectum D0.1cc (Gy) values, MRI-based 4D Brachytherapy plans showed significantly higher prostate V100 (%) values and significantly lower rectum D0.1cc (Gy), urethra D10 (%), and urethra D30 (%) values, and loose seed MRI-based plans showed significantly lower prostate V100 (%), prostate D90 (Gy), rectum D0.1cc (Gy), rectum D2cc (Gy), urethra D10 (%), and urethra D30 (%) values.
CONCLUSIONS: TRUS-based 4D Brachytherapy plans showed similar dosimetry to delivered plans; rectal dosimetry was superior. MRI can be integrated into the 4D Brachytherapy workflow. The webBXT online nomogram overestimates the required number of seeds.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment plans were created retrospectively on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) scans for 26 patients. The technique dubbed 4D Brachytherapy was applied, using TRUS and MRI to obtain prostatic measurements required for the associated webBXT online nomogram. Using a patient's MRI scan to create a treatment plan involving loose seeds was also explored. Plans delivered to patients were made using an intraoperative loose seed TRUS-based planning technique. Prostate V100 (%), prostate V150 (%), prostate D90 (Gy), rectum D0.1cc (Gy), rectum D2cc (Gy), urethra D10 (%), urethra D30 (%), and prostate volumes were measured for each patient. Statistical analysis was used to assess and compare plans.
RESULTS: Prostate volumes measured by TRUS and MRI were significantly different. Prostate volumes calculated by the webBXT online nomogram using TRUS- and MRI-based measurements were not significantly different. Compared with delivered plans, TRUS-based 4D Brachytherapy plans showed significantly lower rectum D0.1cc (Gy) values, MRI-based 4D Brachytherapy plans showed significantly higher prostate V100 (%) values and significantly lower rectum D0.1cc (Gy), urethra D10 (%), and urethra D30 (%) values, and loose seed MRI-based plans showed significantly lower prostate V100 (%), prostate D90 (Gy), rectum D0.1cc (Gy), rectum D2cc (Gy), urethra D10 (%), and urethra D30 (%) values.
CONCLUSIONS: TRUS-based 4D Brachytherapy plans showed similar dosimetry to delivered plans; rectal dosimetry was superior. MRI can be integrated into the 4D Brachytherapy workflow. The webBXT online nomogram overestimates the required number of seeds.