Journal of minimal access surgery · 2024
Impact of uterine weight on surgical outcomes in robotic hysterectomy: An ambispective analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bahadur Anupama, Sharma Shloka, Heda Ayush, Chawla Latika, Mundhra Rajlaxmi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted surgeries are increasingly used for the treatment of benign gynaecological conditions. However, their impact in cases of significantly enlarged uteruses remains uncertain. This study aims to investigate whether the weight of the uterus influences the surgical results of robotic hysterectomy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ambispective analysis of 306 cases was performed, of which 265 cases were analysed retrospectively. The outcome measures included total operative time, including docking time, console time and vault closure time, complication rates and quality of life (World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief questionnaire) stratified based on uterine sizes into three groups by every 250 g.
RESULTS: Of the 306 cases, 76.47% of cases ( n = 234) had uterine weight <250 g, 18.30% of cases ( n = 56) had uterine weight between 250 and 500 g, while 5.23% of cases ( n = 16) had a weight of uterine specimen >500 g. The total operative time was significantly lower in the <250 g group compared to >500 g (81.92 ± 22.81 vs. 111.88 ± 40.27 min; P = 0.003), contributed primarily by the console time. Although the need for post-operative blood transfusion was higher in the >500 g group, the overall complication rate between the three groups was similar. The three groups had comparable QOL through all four domains.
CONCLUSION: The present study underscores the influence of uterine weight on robotic hysterectomy outcomes, revealing increased operative times and post-operative haemoglobin drop for uteri over 500 g. Despite these challenges, complications were not significantly affected by uterine size.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ambispective analysis of 306 cases was performed, of which 265 cases were analysed retrospectively. The outcome measures included total operative time, including docking time, console time and vault closure time, complication rates and quality of life (World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief questionnaire) stratified based on uterine sizes into three groups by every 250 g.
RESULTS: Of the 306 cases, 76.47% of cases ( n = 234) had uterine weight <250 g, 18.30% of cases ( n = 56) had uterine weight between 250 and 500 g, while 5.23% of cases ( n = 16) had a weight of uterine specimen >500 g. The total operative time was significantly lower in the <250 g group compared to >500 g (81.92 ± 22.81 vs. 111.88 ± 40.27 min; P = 0.003), contributed primarily by the console time. Although the need for post-operative blood transfusion was higher in the >500 g group, the overall complication rate between the three groups was similar. The three groups had comparable QOL through all four domains.
CONCLUSION: The present study underscores the influence of uterine weight on robotic hysterectomy outcomes, revealing increased operative times and post-operative haemoglobin drop for uteri over 500 g. Despite these challenges, complications were not significantly affected by uterine size.