Neurourology and urodynamics · 2020
The 5:1 rule overestimates the needed tunnel length during ureteral reimplantation.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kalayeh Kourosh, Brian Fowlkes J, Schultz William W, Sack Bryan S
Аннотация
AIMS: Paquin asserts that in order for ureterovesical junctions (UVJs) to prevent reflux, the ureteral tunnel length-to-diameter ratio needs to be 5:1. We hypothesize that the surgical implementation of this observation results in an overestimation of the needed length-to-diameter ratio to prevent vesicoureteral reflux.
METHODS: With finite elements, we model the urine storage phase of the bladder under nonlinear conditions. In the reference state, the bladder is assumed to be a sphere with an oblique straight elliptical hole as the UVJ. Broad parametric studies on different length-to-diameter ratios are performed as the bladder volume increases from 10% to 110% capacity.
RESULTS: The capability of the UVJ to prevent reflux during storage depends on its length-to-diameter ratio. UVJs with larger length-to-diameter ratios lengthen and narrow as the bladder volume increases, causing the closure of the UVJ and rise in its flow resistance. Our model shows that the UVJ length-to-diameter ratio decreases as the bladder volume increases. The 5:1 ratio implemented at 80% capacity-approximate volume or bladder wall stretch during ureteroneocystostomy (UNC)-corresponds to 7:1 at the reference state-used by Paquin. The 5:1 ratio implemented at the reference state corresponds to 3:1 at 80% capacity.
CONCLUSIONS: Our modeling results are consistent with Paquin's original observation on the significance of the UVJ length-to-diameter ratio in preventing reflux. They, however, indicate that the surgical implementation of this rule during UNC results in an overestimation of the requisite tunnel length-to-diameter ratio to prevent reflux. They also suggest that the UVJ closure is due to the bladder wall deformation rather than the pressure.
METHODS: With finite elements, we model the urine storage phase of the bladder under nonlinear conditions. In the reference state, the bladder is assumed to be a sphere with an oblique straight elliptical hole as the UVJ. Broad parametric studies on different length-to-diameter ratios are performed as the bladder volume increases from 10% to 110% capacity.
RESULTS: The capability of the UVJ to prevent reflux during storage depends on its length-to-diameter ratio. UVJs with larger length-to-diameter ratios lengthen and narrow as the bladder volume increases, causing the closure of the UVJ and rise in its flow resistance. Our model shows that the UVJ length-to-diameter ratio decreases as the bladder volume increases. The 5:1 ratio implemented at 80% capacity-approximate volume or bladder wall stretch during ureteroneocystostomy (UNC)-corresponds to 7:1 at the reference state-used by Paquin. The 5:1 ratio implemented at the reference state corresponds to 3:1 at 80% capacity.
CONCLUSIONS: Our modeling results are consistent with Paquin's original observation on the significance of the UVJ length-to-diameter ratio in preventing reflux. They, however, indicate that the surgical implementation of this rule during UNC results in an overestimation of the requisite tunnel length-to-diameter ratio to prevent reflux. They also suggest that the UVJ closure is due to the bladder wall deformation rather than the pressure.