MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.106625

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of surgery case reports · 2021

An incidental finding of ANET in a patient with perforated appendix: A case report.

Basukala Sunil, Bhusal Ujwal, Sharma Shriya, Tamang Ayush, Gurung Suman

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION AND

IMPORTANCE

Appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors (ANETs) are incidentally found in 0.2-0.7% of appendectomies for suspected appendicitis.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 29-year-old female presented with pain in the right lower quadrant of her abdomen for the past 48 h. On emergency appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis, a perforated appendix was found. Histopathological examination showed grade 1 (low) ANET.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms (ANENs) are commonly found at the tip of the appendix and are treated with appendectomy alone. For few ANENs located at the base, or small tumors (≤2 cm) infiltrating the submucosa, the muscularis, the subserosa layer or the mesoappendix, right hemicolectomy is recommended. However, no guidelines have been established concerning patients with appendiceal perforation in case of ANENs.

CONCLUSION

Although rare, ANETs should be considered in the differential diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Since, ANETs are rarely diagnosed preoperatively, subsequent patient evaluation after appendectomy is crucial for management of the patient.

Для цитирования: Basukala Sunil, Bhusal Ujwal, Sharma Shriya, Tamang Ayush, Gurung Suman. An incidental finding of ANET in a patient with perforated appendix: A case report.. International journal of surgery case reports. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.106625.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.