DOI 10.1016/j.ocarto.2021.100217
Factors associated with use of antibiotic prophylaxis following dental procedures in total joint replacement recipients.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Total joint replacement recipients (TJR) are at risk for prosthetic joint infection (PJI), particularly those with comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus (DM) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS
We mailed surveys to 1078 subjects undergoing primary TJR between 2011 and 2016 at an academic center. The survey asked about medical, dental, and orthopedic history and use of antibiotics prior to dental appointments. We generated adjusted relative risks (aRR) for using antibiotic prophylaxis less than always using Poisson regression, adjusting for demographic, clinical, and behavioral factors.
RESULTS
We received surveys from 639 subjects; 597 were eligible and formed the analytical sample. 66 % reported always using antibiotic prophylaxis. DM and RA were not associated with prophylaxis use. Factors associated with less frequent use included: BMI ≥30 (aRR = 1.27, 95 % CI [1.01, 1.60]), dental cleanings <2 times/year (aRR = 1.95, 95 % CI [1.56, 2.43]), and expressing little concern (compared to neutral) about getting PJI (aRR = 1.23, 95 % CI [0.97, 1.55]), though this association was not statistically significant. Greater antibiotic use was reported in subjects who had ≥3 TJRs, (aRR = 0.48, 95 % CI [0.29, 0.80]), underwent more invasive dental procedures (aRR = 0.74, 95 % CI [0.59, 0.93]), and were concerned (vs. neutral) about PJI (aRR = 0.53, 95 %CI [0.33, 0.84]).
CONCLUSIONS
Two-thirds of TJR recipients in an academic center reported always using antibiotic prophylaxis prior to dental visits. Usage rates varied by demographics, BMI, number of TJRs, type of dental procedure, and behavioral factors -- but not by comorbidities associated with higher PJI risk.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.