The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2022
Characteristics and prognostic significance of right heart remodeling and tricuspid regurgitation after pulmonary endarterectomy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hayashi Hideyuki, Ning Yuming, Kurlansky Paul, Vaynrub Anna, Bacchetta Matthew, Rosenzweig Erika B, Takeda Koji
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Right heart remodeling and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) are common in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. This study aimed to investigate the significance of right heart remodeling and TR after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
METHODS: Patients who underwent PEA with preoperative and postoperative transthoracic echocardiograms at our center between June 2010 and July 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The composite end point was defined as death or hospitalization due to worsening heart failure, bleeding, or recurrent pulmonary embolism.
RESULTS: In total, 158 patients were included for analysis. Right ventricular basal (48 [45-52] vs 43 [39-47] mm, P < .001), midcavitary (46 [42-50] vs 38 [34-42] mm, P < .001), and longitudinal dimensions (87 [83-93] vs 80 [75-84] mm, P < .001), along with the right atrial volume index (37 [25-51] vs 24 [18-34] mL/m2, P < .001), significantly decreased, whereas left ventricular and atrial sizes and left ventricular ejection fraction increased after PEA. Overall, 78 patients (49%) showed significant TR on preoperative transthoracic echocardiograms, and 33 (21%) had significant residual TR after PEA. Fourteen patients died, and 24 patients met the composite end point. Residual TR after PEA was independently associated with mortality (P = .005) and the composite end point (P = .003). Patients with residual TR had significantly worse survival (log-rank P < .001) and greater event rates (log-rank P = .003) than those without residual TR.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvements in right heart remodeling were seen following PEA. However, residual TR was a poor prognostic marker.
METHODS: Patients who underwent PEA with preoperative and postoperative transthoracic echocardiograms at our center between June 2010 and July 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The composite end point was defined as death or hospitalization due to worsening heart failure, bleeding, or recurrent pulmonary embolism.
RESULTS: In total, 158 patients were included for analysis. Right ventricular basal (48 [45-52] vs 43 [39-47] mm, P < .001), midcavitary (46 [42-50] vs 38 [34-42] mm, P < .001), and longitudinal dimensions (87 [83-93] vs 80 [75-84] mm, P < .001), along with the right atrial volume index (37 [25-51] vs 24 [18-34] mL/m2, P < .001), significantly decreased, whereas left ventricular and atrial sizes and left ventricular ejection fraction increased after PEA. Overall, 78 patients (49%) showed significant TR on preoperative transthoracic echocardiograms, and 33 (21%) had significant residual TR after PEA. Fourteen patients died, and 24 patients met the composite end point. Residual TR after PEA was independently associated with mortality (P = .005) and the composite end point (P = .003). Patients with residual TR had significantly worse survival (log-rank P < .001) and greater event rates (log-rank P = .003) than those without residual TR.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvements in right heart remodeling were seen following PEA. However, residual TR was a poor prognostic marker.