MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s005350070023

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of gastroenterology · 2000

Development of duodenal cancer in a patient with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Kashiwagi H, Kanazawa K, Koizumi M, Shibusawa H, Spigelman A D

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A Japanese woman with familial adenomatous polyposis in whom a duodenal ampullary adenoma underwent malignant change during a 10-year follow-up period is reported. After restorative proctocolectomy in 1989, and extensive small bowel resection for desmoid disease in 1991, regular surveillance duodenoscopies, including three to nine biopsies (mean, 4.8) were performed annually or biannually. Until 1995, the endoscopic findings of duodenal polyposis (including an ampullary polyp) did not progress and the histopathology did not worsen. In 1996, there was an increase in the number and size of the duodenal polyps, and the ampulla of Vater looked enlarged. Open surgery was discussed but not proceeded with because of the risk for short bowel syndrome. In January 1998, she was admitted with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Duodenoscopy and radiological examination revealed that an advanced ampullary cancer had developed, and histopathology revealed a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. Multiple hepatic metastases and ascites led to her death, in June, 1998. This in-vivo demonstration of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence highlights current limitations in the surveillance and treatment of duodenal lesions.

Для цитирования: Kashiwagi H, Kanazawa K, Koizumi M, Shibusawa H, Spigelman A D. Development of duodenal cancer in a patient with familial adenomatous polyposis.. Journal of gastroenterology. 2000. DOI: 10.1007/s005350070023.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.