Follow-up study in patients with no stone retrieval from the bile duct after endoscopic sphincterotomy.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
No stones are retrieved from the bile duct in 10-20% of patients with suspected common bile duct (CBD) stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST). The clinical outcome in these patients remains unclear. This study followed patients from whom no stones were retrieved, to discover their clinical outcome.
METHODS
From October, 1990, to October, 1996, 401 patients with suspected CBD stones received EST for stone removal. Only patients from whom no stones were retrieved from the bile duct were included in this study. All enrolled patients were regularly interviewed and received liver function tests. Sonography, computerized tomography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and/or intrapapillary biopsy were performed as indicated.
RESULTS
Forty-two patients were included in this study. The indications for EST included 34 cases with filling defects in the common bile duct on ERCP and eight cases with suspected impacted stones as seen by imaging studies. After a mean follow-up period of 28.6 months (range, 1-61 months), six patients developed biliary stones, four had carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater, one was found to have intrabiliary growth of hepatocellular carcinoma, and there was no pathologic change in 31 cases. Of the six patients with formation of biliary stones, two had an intact gallbladder and four had received previous cholecystectomy. Of the four patients with ampullary tumors, three were diagnosed by intrapapillary biopsy soon after EST, and one was diagnosed nine months later.
CONCLUSIONS
Biliary problems were found in 26% of patients soon after EST, although no stones were retrieved from the bile duct. Regular follow-up is warranted.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.