MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70226-3

Медицинская библиотека · Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 1998

Increased selective biliary cannulation rates in the setting of periampullary diverticula: main pancreatic duct stent placement followed by pre-cut biliary sphincterotomy.

Fogel E L, Sherman S, Lehman G A

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Selective biliary cannulation is often difficult when there is a periampullary diverticulum, especially when the papilla is within the diverticulum. We report eight such cases in which a new technique was used to achieve biliary access.

METHODS

Among 4138 ERCPs, there were 246 cases (5.9%) with periampullary diverticula. Biliary cannulation initially failed in eight patients (3.3%), five of whom had previously undergone six failed attempts at other institutions. A technique was used whereby the papilla was kept out of the diverticulum by placement of a pancreatic duct stent. Needle-knife sphincterotomy was then performed followed by attempts to achieve biliary access.

RESULTS

Biliary entry was immediately successful in five patients and successful at a second ERCP in two (overall success 87.5%). Two patients developed post-ERCP pancreatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

When the papilla is within the periampullary diverticulum, placement of a main pancreatic duct stent keeps the papilla out of the diverticulum, thereby facilitating pre-cut needle-knife sphincterotomy and selective biliary cannulation.

Для цитирования: Fogel E L, Sherman S, Lehman G A. Increased selective biliary cannulation rates in the setting of periampullary diverticula: main pancreatic duct stent placement followed by pre-cut biliary sphincterotomy.. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 1998. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70226-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.