MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.21289

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2010

Evaluation of available surgical management options for early supraglottic cancer.

Karatzanis Alexander D, Psychogios George, Zenk Johannes, Waldfahrer Frank, Hornung Joachim, Velegrakis George A, Iro Heinrich

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to evaluate the oncologic results of endoscopic and open surgical techniques in early supraglottic cancer.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective evaluation of 101 patients surgically treated for stage I or II supraglottic carcinomas. Laser surgery, horizontal laryngectomy, and total laryngectomy were compared for disease-specific survival and local control rates. Surgical techniques were additionally compared for incidence of major complications, related tracheotomies, and swallowing function retention.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were noted among the different types of procedures regarding disease-specific survival and local control. A lower incidence of major complications, permanent gastrostomies, and significantly lower incidence of tracheotomies were noted for laser surgery compared with open techniques.

CONCLUSION

Larynx-preserving surgical modalities offer comparable oncologic results with total laryngectomy in early supraglottic cancer. In addition, laser surgery has a lower incidence of complications and better functional results compared with open partial or total laryngectomy.

Для цитирования: Karatzanis Alexander D, Psychogios George, Zenk Johannes, Waldfahrer Frank, Hornung Joachim, Velegrakis George A, Iro Heinrich. Evaluation of available surgical management options for early supraglottic cancer.. Head & neck. 2010. DOI: 10.1002/hed.21289.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.