Repeated transoral laser microsurgery for early and advanced recurrence of early glottic cancer after primary laser resection.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To analyze the oncological results of repeated transoral laser microresection (TLM) in case of failure after primary laser resection of early glottic cancer (pTis-pT2).
METHODS
Fifty-six patients with local or loco-regional recurrence of early glottic cancer were treated between 1988 and 2005 by repeated TLM followed, if necessary, by neck dissection and/or adjuvant radio- or radiochemotherapy. Data on overall survival, disease-specific survival, and loco-regional control rates were analyzed retrospectively and calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS
Forty-four patients (78.6%) presented with early local recurrence (rTis-rT2N0; Stage I/II) and 12 patients (21.4%) had advanced local or loco-regional recurrence (pT3 and pT4N0/N+; Stage III/IV). Three- and five-year overall survival rates for patients with early and advanced recurrence were 75.1% vs. 51.6% and 61.6% vs. 25.8%, respectively. The corresponding three- and five-year disease-specific survival rates were 87.2% vs. 85.7% and 81.0% vs. 85.7%, respectively. Three- and five-year loco-regional control was significantly higher for patients treated for early recurrence (67.6% vs. 27.5% and 63.6% vs. 27.5%, respectively; p=0.02). Salvage laryngectomy rates for patients with early and advanced recurrence were 9.1 and 25.0%, respectively. In patients with early local recurrence, anterior commissure involvement (n=11) did not affect the oncological results.
CONCLUSIONS
In case of early local recurrence after primary TLM of early glottic cancer, further TLM seems to be justified as an organ-preserving treatment option. In contrast, salvage laryngectomy should be considered early for patients with advanced local or loco-regional recurrence.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.