MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.04.037

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of emergency medicine · 2008

Analysis of prehospital care for cardiac arrest in an urban setting in Japan.

Yanagawa Youichi, Sakamoto Toshihisa

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

In Japan, the management of prehospital care for cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) has recently changed.

STUDY

OBJECTIVES

The characteristics of prehospital care for CPA were analyzed to identify predictors of prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (PROSC) and good recovery.

METHODS

The characteristics of prehospital management of 713 out-of-hospital CPA patients in the First Western District of Saitama Prefecture, Japan, were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, PROSC rate was 9.5% (n = 68), and 2.2% of patients (n = 16) made a good recovery. Significant positive predictors of PROSC were: duration from the first call to hospital arrival, witnessed collapse, ventricular fibrillation at scene, and epinephrine administration. Establishment of supraglottic airway was a significant negative predictor of PROSC. Significant positive predictors of good recovery were younger age, ventricular fibrillation at scene, and PROSC. Changes to the life support protocol based on 2005 guidelines did not affect the outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Epinephrine was effective in increasing PROSC; however, it did not improve recovery of such patients. The findings also suggest that out-of-hospital care providers should not try to establish a supraglottic airway.

Для цитирования: Yanagawa Youichi, Sakamoto Toshihisa. Analysis of prehospital care for cardiac arrest in an urban setting in Japan.. The Journal of emergency medicine. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.04.037.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.