Molecular metabolism · 2026
Hepatocyte-specific Cas9-mediated editing of G6pc and Slc37a4 elicits comparable biochemical and regulatory responses between glycogen storage disease (GSD) type Ia and Ib mice.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Krishnamurthy Kishore A, Xiao Ruiqi, Rutten Martijn G S, Bos Trijnie, Bleeker Aycha, Zhang Mingjia, de Vries Hilda I, Koster Mirjam, Huijkman Nicolette, Smit Marieke, Kloosterhuis Niels, Boer Theo, Schomakers Bauke, van Weeghel Michel, van de Sluis Bart, Wolters Justina C, Bakker Barbara M, Oosterveer Maaike H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Glycogen storage disease type I (GSD I) is an autosomal recessive inborn error of carbohydrate metabolism. Patients with GSD type Ia and Ib exhibit overlapping and distinct symptoms and complications. Notably, GSD Ia patients show more severe hypertriglyceridemia and higher risk of hepatic tumors than GSD Ib patients.
METHODS: Given the liver's pivotal role in these processes, this study utilized hepatocyte-specific CRISPR/Cas9-mediated somatic gene editing to explore the pathophysiological and biochemical adaptations in hepatic GSD Ia and Ib side-by-side. Additionally, hepatic histology, transcriptomics, and proteomics analysis was performed.
RESULTS: Compared to controls, hepatic GSD Ia and Ib mice showed hepatomegaly, fasting hypoglycemia, hyperlactatemia, and increased uric acid in plasma, which was somewhat more pronounced in GSD Ia than Ib. Both GSD I subtypes showed similar reductions in hepatic acetyl-CoA precursor pool enrichment and increases in de novo biosynthesis of hepatic stearate and oleate. Interestingly, only GSD Ia mice showed mildly elevated plasma triglyceride and hepatic phosphate sugars. Metabolic changes were reflected at the transcriptomic and proteomic levels, with largely similar responses between GSD Ia and Ib livers. Moreover, altered mRNAs and protein levels related to nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD) signaling pathways, infection and inflammation, liver disease, and chemical carcinogenesis were somewhat more pronounced in hepatic GSD Ia than in GSD Ib mice.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the metabolic disturbance was more severe in hepatocyte-specific GSD Ia than in GSD Ib mice, consistent with the clinical phenotype in patients. The metabolic disorders and specific metabolites, genes, and proteins identified in this study provided new insights into the pathophysiological and biochemical phenotypes of GSD I subtypes in the liver.
METHODS: Given the liver's pivotal role in these processes, this study utilized hepatocyte-specific CRISPR/Cas9-mediated somatic gene editing to explore the pathophysiological and biochemical adaptations in hepatic GSD Ia and Ib side-by-side. Additionally, hepatic histology, transcriptomics, and proteomics analysis was performed.
RESULTS: Compared to controls, hepatic GSD Ia and Ib mice showed hepatomegaly, fasting hypoglycemia, hyperlactatemia, and increased uric acid in plasma, which was somewhat more pronounced in GSD Ia than Ib. Both GSD I subtypes showed similar reductions in hepatic acetyl-CoA precursor pool enrichment and increases in de novo biosynthesis of hepatic stearate and oleate. Interestingly, only GSD Ia mice showed mildly elevated plasma triglyceride and hepatic phosphate sugars. Metabolic changes were reflected at the transcriptomic and proteomic levels, with largely similar responses between GSD Ia and Ib livers. Moreover, altered mRNAs and protein levels related to nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD) signaling pathways, infection and inflammation, liver disease, and chemical carcinogenesis were somewhat more pronounced in hepatic GSD Ia than in GSD Ib mice.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the metabolic disturbance was more severe in hepatocyte-specific GSD Ia than in GSD Ib mice, consistent with the clinical phenotype in patients. The metabolic disorders and specific metabolites, genes, and proteins identified in this study provided new insights into the pathophysiological and biochemical phenotypes of GSD I subtypes in the liver.