Immune-mediated diseases and immunodeficiencies associated with thymic epithelial neoplasms.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
This retrospective study aimed to characterize the clinical hematological and immunological features of patients with thymic epithelial neoplasms.
METHODS
From a cohort of 512 patients with thymic epithelial neoplasms, 79 patients diagnosed with autoimmune/immunodeficiency conditions or signs and/or symptoms suggesting an autoimmune or immunodeficiency state were evaluated by standard immunological and hematological testing.
RESULTS
Elevated percentages of CD2+, CD3+, and CD8+ lymphocytes were observed in 44 (57.1%), 33 (41.8%), and 32 (40.5%) patients. Low CD4+ and CD19+ percentages were observed in 25 (31.6%) and 36 (46.2%), respectively; CD4+:CD8+ ratios were inverted in 18 (22.8%). IgG, IgA, and IgM levels were low in 12 (15.8%), 9 (11.7%) and 15 (19.7%) patients, respectively. Patients with immunodeficiency condition(s) were more likely to have high CD8+ percentages (p = 0.040), low CD19+ percentages (p = 0.025), and/or inverted CD4+/CD8+ ratios (p = 0.034). Patients with autoimmune condition(s) were more likely to have a high/normal CD4+ percentage (p = 0.038). High CD2+ percentages were associated with lower mean IgG and IgA levels (p = 0.030 and p = 0.017, respectively). High CD3+ and CD8+ percentages were associated with lower mean IgA levels (p = 0.046 and p = 0.013, respectively). Low CD19+ percentages were associated with lower mean IgG and IgA levels (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSION
Signs/symptoms and history of autoimmune and immunodeficiency conditions among patients with thymic epithelial neoplasms are associated with high frequencies of abnormalities in immunoglobulin levels and lymphocyte immunophenotypes, suggesting a role for their assessment.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.