MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.018

Медицинская библиотека · Gynecologic oncology · 2013

A phase II evaluation of AMG 102 (rilotumumab) in the treatment of persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Martin Lainie P, Sill Michael, Shahin Mark S, Powell Matthew, DiSilvestro Paul, Landrum Lisa M, Gaillard Stephanie L, Goodheart Michael J, Hoffman James, Schilder Russell J

Клиническое исследование II фазыСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This open-label, multi-institutional phase II trial evaluated activity and safety of rilotumumab (AMG 102), a monoclonal antibody that targets HGF (hepatocyte growth factor), the ligand for the MET receptor, in women with recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Women were eligible for treatment with rilotumumab if they had measurable disease, a performance status of 0, 1 or 2, previously received platinum-based therapy with a progression-free interval of <12 months or a second recurrence, and adequate bone marrow and organ function. Patients received rilotumumab 20mg/kg IV every 14 days until evidence of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The study utilized co-dual primary endpoints of tumor response and six-month PFS to assess the efficacy of rilotumumab. Secondary endpoints included the frequency and severity of adverse events and the duration of progression-free and overall survival.

RESULTS

Thirty-one women enrolled and received rilotumumab. All were eligible for analysis. One patient achieved a complete response (3.2%; 90% CI 0.2-14%), and two women had 6-month PFS (6.5%; 90% CI 1.1-19%). Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2, with no grade 4 adverse events. Grade 3 adverse events were gastrointestinal (4), metabolic (3) anemia (3), a thromboembolic event (1), ventricular tachycardia (1), hypotension during infusion (1) and fatigue (1). The study was stopped after the first stage of accrual.

CONCLUSION

Rilotumumab was well-tolerated, but had limited activity. The level of activity does not warrant further evaluation of rilotumumab as a single agent in patients with ovarian cancer.

Для цитирования: Martin Lainie P, Sill Michael, Shahin Mark S, Powell Matthew, DiSilvestro Paul, Landrum Lisa M, Gaillard Stephanie L, Goodheart Michael J, Hoffman James, Schilder Russell J. A phase II evaluation of AMG 102 (rilotumumab) in the treatment of persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.. Gynecologic oncology. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.018.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.