MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.12669/pjms.303.4545

Медицинская библиотека · Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2014

Uterine closure with unlocked suture in cesarean section: Safety and Quality.

Turan Guluzar Arzu, Gur Esra Bahar, Tatar Sumeyra, Gokduman Ayse, Guclu Serkan

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Comparing locked and unlocked uterine closure techniques in terms of bleeding control and uterine incision healing.

METHODS

The patients undergoing cesarean section in Sifa University Hospital between May - October 2012 were accepted to this prospective controlled study. Primarily, safety was evaluated. The hemoglobin count (HC) and serum creatine kinase (CK) levels of the patients in the locked (n = 47) and unlocked (n = 35) groups were measured just before and 24 hours after operation. Hemoglobin deficit, increase in CK and the additional hemostatic sutures were compared. Secondly, uterine scar healing was evaluated three months later. Scar thickness, niche and percentage of thinning of the scar region of the locked (n = 27) and unlocked (n = 32) groups were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

The hemoglobin deficit was similar in two groups. CK rise was less in the unlocked group but it was not significant (P = 0.082). Unlocked group needed more additional sutures (P = 0.016). The thickness of the niche and the percentage of thinning of the scar region were significantly less in the unlocked group (P= 0.002, P=0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Unlocked uterine closure technique is safe and has less damage to the myometrium.

Для цитирования: Turan Guluzar Arzu, Gur Esra Bahar, Tatar Sumeyra, Gokduman Ayse, Guclu Serkan. Uterine closure with unlocked suture in cesarean section: Safety and Quality.. Pakistan journal of medical sciences. 2014. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.303.4545.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.