Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2022
Coexistence of anterior cranial fossa dural arteriovenous fistula and arteriovenous malformation with the same drainage system: illustrative case.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yamamoto Daisuke, Shibahara Ichiyo, Inukai Madoka, Koizumi Hiroyuki, Hyakutake Yuri, Niki Jun, Ishima Daisuke, Usui Ryo, Kimura Ayato, Hide Takuichiro, Kumabe Toshihiro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The authors report a rare case of coexistence of dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF) and arteriovenous malformation (AVM), with a common trunk drainer from both DAVF and AVM in the left anterior cranial fossa (ACF) with simple DAVF in the right ACF.
OBSERVATIONS: A 63-year-old female presented with seizure. Cerebral angiography showed bilateral DAVFs in the ACF and AVM in the left frontal lobe. A dilated frontal vein acted as a simple drainer of the right DAVF. In contrast, a dilated vein with large varix was the common drainer of both the left DAVF and the AVM. During surgery, indocyanine green videoangiography was performed with direct observation. In the left ACF, the drainer occlusion of the DAVF resulted in partial shrinkage of the varix and decreased distal blood flow. Additional main feeder occlusion of the AVM could decrease the blood flow further, but not completely because of the residual pial supplies for the AVM. Finally, the nidus of the AVM with varix was removed by en bloc resection.
LESSONS: Neurosurgeons should be aware of the coexistence of DAVF and AVM with a common trunk drainer. Only simple occlusion of the drainer from DAVF is not sufficient, so removal of the AVM is essential.
OBSERVATIONS: A 63-year-old female presented with seizure. Cerebral angiography showed bilateral DAVFs in the ACF and AVM in the left frontal lobe. A dilated frontal vein acted as a simple drainer of the right DAVF. In contrast, a dilated vein with large varix was the common drainer of both the left DAVF and the AVM. During surgery, indocyanine green videoangiography was performed with direct observation. In the left ACF, the drainer occlusion of the DAVF resulted in partial shrinkage of the varix and decreased distal blood flow. Additional main feeder occlusion of the AVM could decrease the blood flow further, but not completely because of the residual pial supplies for the AVM. Finally, the nidus of the AVM with varix was removed by en bloc resection.
LESSONS: Neurosurgeons should be aware of the coexistence of DAVF and AVM with a common trunk drainer. Only simple occlusion of the drainer from DAVF is not sufficient, so removal of the AVM is essential.