The International journal of neuroscience · 2020
Assessing the cervico-ocular reflex system via modifying the ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential test.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hsu Shuo-Yen, Young Yi-Ho
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to devise a novel test for assessing the cervico-ocular reflex (COR) system via head vibration (termed h-COR) or neck vibration (termed n-COR) method.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with complete loss of bilateral vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) showing oscillopsia were assigned to Group A, while 13 patients with bilateral VOR loss but no oscillopsia were Group B. Another 13 healthy elderly served as a control. The COR test was performed via modifying the ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) test by tapping at the forehead with head rotation (h-COR) or at mid-dorsal neck with head straight (n-COR).
RESULTS: Both h-COR and n-COR tests displayed similar cI-cII waveforms. None of the Group A or healthy elderly showed present h-COR, while 8% of Group A and 31% of the healthy elderly revealed present n-COR. In contrast, present h-COR and n-COR were elicited in 85 and 77% of Group B, respectively. Restated, significantly higher response rate of COR in Group B (without oscillopsia) than Group A (with oscillopsia) indicates that present COR is related to the alleviation of oscillopsia.
CONCLUSIONS: Head vibration method (h-COR test) is superior to neck vibration method (n-COR test) for assessing the COR system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with complete loss of bilateral vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) showing oscillopsia were assigned to Group A, while 13 patients with bilateral VOR loss but no oscillopsia were Group B. Another 13 healthy elderly served as a control. The COR test was performed via modifying the ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) test by tapping at the forehead with head rotation (h-COR) or at mid-dorsal neck with head straight (n-COR).
RESULTS: Both h-COR and n-COR tests displayed similar cI-cII waveforms. None of the Group A or healthy elderly showed present h-COR, while 8% of Group A and 31% of the healthy elderly revealed present n-COR. In contrast, present h-COR and n-COR were elicited in 85 and 77% of Group B, respectively. Restated, significantly higher response rate of COR in Group B (without oscillopsia) than Group A (with oscillopsia) indicates that present COR is related to the alleviation of oscillopsia.
CONCLUSIONS: Head vibration method (h-COR test) is superior to neck vibration method (n-COR test) for assessing the COR system.