MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100639

Медицинская библиотека · Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024

A treatment-site-specific evaluation of commercial synthetic computed tomography solutions for proton therapy.

Yeap Ping Lin, Wong Yun Ming, Lee Kang Hao, Koh Calvin Wei Yang, Lew Kah Seng, Chua Clifford Ghee Ann, Wibawa Andrew, Master Zubin, Lee James Cheow Lei, Park Sung Yong, Tan Hong Qi

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Despite the superior dose conformity of proton therapy, the dose distribution is sensitive to daily anatomical changes, which can affect treatment accuracy. This study evaluated the dose recalculation accuracy of two synthetic computed tomography (sCT) generation algorithms in a commercial treatment planning system.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The evaluation was conducted for head-and-neck, thorax-and-abdomen, and pelvis sites treated with proton therapy. Thirty patients with two cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans each were selected. The sCT images were generated from CBCT scans using two algorithms, Corrected CBCT (corrCBCT) and Virtual CT (vCT). Dose recalculations were performed based on these images for comparison with "ground truth" deformed CTs.

RESULTS

The choice of algorithm influenced dose recalculation accuracy, particularly in high dose regions. For head-and-neck cases, the corrCBCT method showed closer agreement with the "ground truth", while for thorax-and-abdomen and pelvis cases, the vCT algorithm yielded better results (mean percentage dose discrepancy of 0.6 %, 1.3 % and 0.5 % for the three sites, respectively, in the high dose region). Head-and-neck and pelvis cases exhibited excellent agreement in high dose regions (2 %/2 mm gamma passing rate >98 %), while thorax-and-abdomen cases exhibited the largest differences, suggesting caution in sCT algorithm usage for this site. Significant systematic differences were observed in the clinical target volume and organ-at-risk doses in head-and-neck and pelvis cases, highlighting the importance of using the correct algorithm.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided treatment site-specific recommendations for sCT algorithm selection in proton therapy. The findings offered insights for proton beam centers implementing adaptive radiotherapy workflows.

Для цитирования: Yeap Ping Lin, Wong Yun Ming, Lee Kang Hao, Koh Calvin Wei Yang, Lew Kah Seng, Chua Clifford Ghee Ann, Wibawa Andrew, Master Zubin, Lee James Cheow Lei, Park Sung Yong, Tan Hong Qi. A treatment-site-specific evaluation of commercial synthetic computed tomography solutions for proton therapy.. Physics and imaging in radiation oncology. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100639.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.