Clinical features and prognosis of gastric MALT lymphoma with special reference to responsiveness to H. pylori eradication and API2-MALT1 status.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of Helicobacter pylori eradication-resistant gastric MALT lymphoma have not been well clarified. We analyzed a consecutive series of gastric MALT lymphomas at our institution regarding treatment, clinical course, and prognosis, with special reference to responsiveness to H. pylori eradication and presence of API2-MALT1.

METHODS

Subjects were 92 consecutive patients with gastric MALT lymphoma. Seventy were H. pylori positive, and 87 received H. pylori eradication therapy. The remaining five cases were API2-MALT1 positive and did not receive eradication treatment. Second-line treatments were radiation therapy, total gastrectomy, and chemotherapy (rituximab, rituximab plus CHOP, or rituximab plus 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine).

RESULTS

Gastric MALT lymphoma was classified into three groups, except one case with API2-MALT1 who responded to H. pylori eradication therapy: responders without API2-MALT1 (group A, N = 56, 65%), nonresponders without API2-MALT1 (group B, N = 16, 19%), and nonresponders with API2-MALT1 (group C, N = 14, 16%). Most cases in group A attained complete remission (CR) in 2 or 3 months and CR persisted for an average of 51.1 months (3-134 months). Recurrence was only seen in one case. In groups B and C, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and total gastrectomy resulted in CR in 13, 5, and 2 cases, respectively. In 5 group B patients and 6 group C patients who did not undergo second-line therapy, disease did not progress for an average of 10.4 and 40.1 months, respectively. In 1 group C case who did not receive second-line treatment, lymphoma metastasized to the lung 12 yr after eradication. All group B patients and all but 2 group C patients remain alive; one of these deaths was from gastric carcinoma developing 7 yr after eradication.

CONCLUSION

Gastric MALT lymphoma responding to H. pylori eradication demonstrated good prognosis, and for nonresponsive cases, second-line treatments resulted in CR. However, careful observation for development of gastric carcinoma and disease progression is essential during follow-up of API2-MALT1-positive MALT lymphoma when patients decline second-line treatment.