MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0022215122001566

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2022

A systematic review on efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of office-based laryngeal biopsy.

Swaminathan R, Rosa Opatha S, Mughal Z, Prasad S

Систематический обзорСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Laryngeal cancer is the second most prevalent head and neck malignancy in the USA. With recent advances in technology, this procedure is increasingly performed under local anaesthesia. This study aimed to identify the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of laryngeal biopsy in out-patients by conducting a systematic review.

METHOD: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar and Embase over a 20-year period. Inclusion criteria were: studies performed on out-patient diagnostic biopsy procedures of the larynx. Exclusion criteria included all therapeutic procedures. The outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity, complication rate and cost-savings.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies were included in the analysis. The sensitivity and specificity varied from 60 to 100 per cent with a low complication rate and cost savings.

CONCLUSION

Office-based laryngeal biopsies are increasingly used in the diagnosis of laryngeal cancers, resulting in earlier diagnosis and commencement of treatment. The barrier to undertaking this procedure is low sensitivity.

Для цитирования: Swaminathan R, Rosa Opatha S, Mughal Z, Prasad S. A systematic review on efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of office-based laryngeal biopsy.. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 2022. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215122001566.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.