MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00384-017-2913-6

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of colorectal disease · 2017

Management of early anal cancer: need for guidelines and standardisation.

Jones Michael P, Carroll Susan, Martin Jarad, Hillman Richard, Grulich Andrew, O'Connell Dianne, Young Christopher, Poynten Isobel Mary

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The optimal management of early squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (AC) is yet to be determined. This study investigated current practice in the management of early AC.

METHODS

A patterns of care survey was completed by Australian surgeons and radiation oncologists. Specific topics addressed were as follows: geographical location of practice, staging of disease, treatment approaches to T1N0 tumours and grade 3 anal intra-epithelial neoplasia (AIN3) lesions, radiotherapy planning, toxicities, follow-up and clinical trial involvement.

RESULTS

Sixty-four responses were obtained. For the management of T1N0 disease, half the respondents recommended standard dose chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) and one third recommended wide local excision (WLE). For the management of AIN3, half recommended WLE while a quarter advocated observation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals a significant variation in the management of early AC. The development of guidelines specific to the treatment of early AC could standardise treatment while further research is required to define the optimal management of T1N0 AC and AIN.

Для цитирования: Jones Michael P, Carroll Susan, Martin Jarad, Hillman Richard, Grulich Andrew, O'Connell Dianne, Young Christopher, Poynten Isobel Mary. Management of early anal cancer: need for guidelines and standardisation.. International journal of colorectal disease. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-017-2913-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.