MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.24810

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2017

Total versus superficial parotidectomy for stage III melanoma.

Wertz Aileen P, Durham Alison B, Malloy Kelly M, Johnson Timothy M, Bradford Carol R, McLean Scott A

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The primary purpose of this study was to describe the parotid recurrence rates after superficial and total parotidectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients with cutaneous melanoma metastatic to the parotid gland who underwent parotidectomy from 1998 through 2014. Primary outcome was parotid bed recurrence. Secondary outcomes were facial nerve function postoperatively and at last follow-up.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-nine patients were included in the study. Thirty-four patients (26%) underwent a total parotidectomy and 95 patients underwent superficial parotidectomy. Twelve patients (13%) developed parotid bed recurrence after superficial parotidectomy alone versus zero after total parotidectomy (P = .035). Facial nerve function, clinically detected disease, stage, and adjuvant treatment were not statistically different between the groups (P = .32, .32, .13, and 0.99, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Parotid bed melanoma recurrence was more common after superficial parotidectomy compared to total parotidectomy, and recurrence resulted in significant facial nerve functional deficit. Our results support total parotidectomy when metastatic melanoma involves the parotid nodal basin.

Для цитирования: Wertz Aileen P, Durham Alison B, Malloy Kelly M, Johnson Timothy M, Bradford Carol R, McLean Scott A. Total versus superficial parotidectomy for stage III melanoma.. Head & neck. 2017. DOI: 10.1002/hed.24810.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.