Acta gastroenterologica Latinoamericana · 2022
[Duodenal Biopsies: Individual or Multiple Samples?].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rettally Carlos A, Roy Milantia
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Duodenal biopsies are crucial for appropriate diagnosis of multiple pathologies. For that reason, the pathologist must have the right quantity and quality of tissue. It is not clear yeat what is the best way to obtain it while performing the endoscopy.
OBJECTIVES: This study seeks to compare the quality of duodenal samples obtained by two different biopsy protocols.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred patients referred for upper endoscopy with duodenal biopsies indications were separated in two groups: "multiple samples" (two) or "individual sample". Patients with no indication for duodenal biopsy were excluded.
RESULTS: When multiple samples were taken, 87% were suitable for histopathological analysis and when individual sample was taken, 86.5% were suitable for histopathological analysis.
CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that multiple samples (two) or individual sample both provide specimens of similar quality suitable for histopathological diagnosis.
OBJECTIVES: This study seeks to compare the quality of duodenal samples obtained by two different biopsy protocols.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred patients referred for upper endoscopy with duodenal biopsies indications were separated in two groups: "multiple samples" (two) or "individual sample". Patients with no indication for duodenal biopsy were excluded.
RESULTS: When multiple samples were taken, 87% were suitable for histopathological analysis and when individual sample was taken, 86.5% were suitable for histopathological analysis.
CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that multiple samples (two) or individual sample both provide specimens of similar quality suitable for histopathological diagnosis.