DOI 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2019.06.004
[The clinical effects of methylprednisolone combined with vestibular rehabilitation and methylprednisolone in the treatment of vestibular neuritis].
Аннотация
Objective
To explore the clinical effect of vestibular rehabilitation on vestibular neuritis. Method:Fifty patients with vestibular neuritis (VN) were randomly divided into study group (n=26) and control group (n=24). The patient in study group received methylprednisolone treatment and peripheral vestibular rehabilitation therapy, while that in the control group received methylprednisolone only. Spontaneous nystagmus (SN), caloric test (CP), directional preponderance (DP),vestibular muscle evoked potential (VEMP) were comparative for study group and control group at admission, 1 month after treatment, and 3 months after treatment. Result:①There was no significant difference in the balance between the two groups. ②After 1 month treatment, the directional preponderance of DP decreased (P<0.01) in the study group(21.09±16.90)% compared with the control group(41.11±24.03)%, VEMP extraction rate increased (P<0.05) in the study group compared with the control group, dynamic balance score of the study group (70.77±16.15) increased (P<0.05) compared with the control group (53.83±26.76). ③After 3 months, canal paresis CP of the study group (33.26±20.01)% decreased (P<0.05) compared with the control group (50.07±25.42)%, DP of the study group (8.63±5.65)% decreased (P<0.01) compared with the control group (17.98±8.84)%, and the comprehensive dynamic balance score of the study group (81.58±3.67) increased (P<0.01) compared with the control group (62.50±29.24).
Conclusion
Peripheral vestibular rehabilitation can accelerate vestibular compensation and is an effective treatment for vestibular neurons.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.