MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12886-020-01445-6

Медицинская библиотека · BMC ophthalmology · 2020

Pathology features and the results of treatment of two cases of posterior choroidal leiomyoma.

Zhou Nan, Wei Wenbin, Xu Xiaolin

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Posterior choroidal leiomyoma is an extremely rare tumor, to our knowledge, less than 10 cases reported in the literature. The definite diagnosis can be confirmed by immunohistochemistry, and local resection is preferable to enucleation for the posterior choroidal leiomyoma.

CASE PRESENTATION: Two adult Asian women presented with progressive vision loss in their right eyes. Ophthalmic examination revealed an amelanotic dome-shaped choroidal mass located in the fundus with yellowish exudative retinal detachment. Clinical differential diagnosis of a nonpigmented choroidal neoplasm mainly includes amelanotic melanoma, atypical hemangioma, metastatic carcinoma, as well as the rare posterior choroidal leiomyoma. Considering the choroidal lesion was more likely to be a benign tumor, then we performed the treatment of local resection by pars plana vitrectomy and the histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of choroidal leiomyoma. The best corrected visual acuity of the patients was more than 20/100 on 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

From these two posterior choroidal neoplasm cases, we were able to demonstrate local resection by the 23 to 25-gauge mircoinvasive vitrectomy for excision of intraocular tumors is a feasible treatment for choroidal leiomyoma.

Для цитирования: Zhou Nan, Wei Wenbin, Xu Xiaolin. Pathology features and the results of treatment of two cases of posterior choroidal leiomyoma.. BMC ophthalmology. 2020. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-020-01445-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.