BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2020
Comparison of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and secondary myomectomy for recurrent symptomatic uterine fibroids following myomectomy: a retrospective study.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu X, Tang J, Luo Y, Wang Y, Song L, Wang W
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term symptom alleviation and re-intervention of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation and secondary myomectomy for women with recurrent symptomatic uterine fibroids following myomectomy.
DESIGN: A retrospective analysis.
SETTING: A general hospital in China.
POPULATION: One hundred and eighty-eight women with recurrent symptomatic uterine fibroids following myomectomy.
METHODS: Women who underwent HIFU ablation (n = 101) and secondary myomectomy (n = 87) at Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2008 to December 2016 were analysed. Symptom relief and recurrence were evaluated using the transformed symptom severity scale (tSSS). The additional intervention and treatment-related complications were also recorded and compared.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Difference in symptom alleviation, recurrence, re-intervention and complications.
RESULTS: Follow-up time was comparable for the two groups (56 versus 60 months; P = 0.88). Regarding tSSS, at 3 months there was improvement in all tSSS for both treatment groups. The time to re-intervention was shorter in the myomectomy group. The cumulative risk for re-intervention after HIFU ablation at 1 and 3 years was lower than that after secondary myomectomy (0% versus 4.8%, 3.2% versus 11.9%, respectively); however, no significant difference was observed at 5 and 8 years. There were fewer adverse events in the HIFU ablation group than the myomectomy group (59.4% versus 77%, P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of recurrent symptomatic uterine fibroids offers comparable long-term alleviation of symptoms with longer time interval to re-intervention and fewer adverse events compared with secondary myomectomy.
TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of recurrent uterine fibroids offered a longer time interval to re-intervention and fewer adverse events compared with myomectomy.
DESIGN: A retrospective analysis.
SETTING: A general hospital in China.
POPULATION: One hundred and eighty-eight women with recurrent symptomatic uterine fibroids following myomectomy.
METHODS: Women who underwent HIFU ablation (n = 101) and secondary myomectomy (n = 87) at Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2008 to December 2016 were analysed. Symptom relief and recurrence were evaluated using the transformed symptom severity scale (tSSS). The additional intervention and treatment-related complications were also recorded and compared.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Difference in symptom alleviation, recurrence, re-intervention and complications.
RESULTS: Follow-up time was comparable for the two groups (56 versus 60 months; P = 0.88). Regarding tSSS, at 3 months there was improvement in all tSSS for both treatment groups. The time to re-intervention was shorter in the myomectomy group. The cumulative risk for re-intervention after HIFU ablation at 1 and 3 years was lower than that after secondary myomectomy (0% versus 4.8%, 3.2% versus 11.9%, respectively); however, no significant difference was observed at 5 and 8 years. There were fewer adverse events in the HIFU ablation group than the myomectomy group (59.4% versus 77%, P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of recurrent symptomatic uterine fibroids offers comparable long-term alleviation of symptoms with longer time interval to re-intervention and fewer adverse events compared with secondary myomectomy.
TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of recurrent uterine fibroids offered a longer time interval to re-intervention and fewer adverse events compared with myomectomy.