MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/aog.0000000000004027

Медицинская библиотека · Obstetrics and gynecology · 2020

Two Intraoperative Techniques for Midurethral Sling Tensioning: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Brennand Erin A, Wu Guosong, Houlihan Sara, Globerman Dobrochna, Gagnon Louise-Helene, Birch Colin, Hyakutake Momoe, Carlson Kevin V, Al-Shankiti Hanan, Robert Magali, Lazare Darren, Kim-Fine Shunaha, Calgary Women's Pelvic Health Research Group

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАEquivalence TrialПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the use of a Mayo Scissor as a suburethral spacer compared with a Babcock clamp holding a loop of tape under the urethra results in different rates of abnormal bladder outcomes 12 months after retropubic midurethral sling surgery.

METHODS

The MUST (Mid-Urethral Sling Tensioning) trial was a block-randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial that allocated women to have their retropubic midurethral slings tensioned by Scissor or Babcock technique. The primary outcome (abnormal bladder) was a composite of persistent stress urinary incontinence (SUI), overactive bladder, and urinary retention. Secondary outcomes included outcomes of the composite, postoperative catheterization, incontinence-related questionnaires, repeat incontinence treatment, and uroflowmetry. Sample size of 159 in each arm (N=318) was planned for a superiority trial, hypothesizing a 10% difference in primary outcome.

RESULTS

From September 2015 to December 2017, 506 women were screened and 318 were randomized. Baseline characteristics were similar in each arm. At 12 months, 253 (79.6%) women provided information on primary outcome: 40 of 128 (31.3%) patients with midurethral slings tensioned by Scissor experienced abnormal bladder, compared with 23 of 125 (18.4%) of those with midurethral slings tensioned by Babcock (P=.018, relative difference 12.9%). Secondary analyses favored Babcock for median duration of catheterization and the proportions of women experiencing urinary retention requiring sling lysis. Uroflowmetry parameters suggest the Scissor technique is more restrictive. Rates of mesh erosion were lower for the Scissor arm. No differences occurred in proportions of women experiencing patient reported persistent SUI after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Abnormal bladder outcomes were 12.9% less frequent for women with midurethral slings tensioned by Babcock. Both techniques provided a comparable patient reported cure for SUI at 12 months. Women with midurethral slings tensioned by Scissors experienced more intervention for obstruction, whereas those with midurethral slings tensioned by Babcock experienced higher rates of mesh erosion. This information about how the postoperative courses differ allows surgeons to better counsel patients preoperatively or tailor their choice of technique.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02480231.

FUNDING SOURCE: Boston Scientific.

Для цитирования: Brennand Erin A, Wu Guosong, Houlihan Sara, Globerman Dobrochna, Gagnon Louise-Helene, Birch Colin, Hyakutake Momoe, Carlson Kevin V, Al-Shankiti Hanan, Robert Magali, Lazare Darren, Kim-Fine Shunaha, Calgary Women's Pelvic Health Research Group. Two Intraoperative Techniques for Midurethral Sling Tensioning: A Randomized Controlled Trial.. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2020. DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004027.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.